Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="spinozajack" data-source="post: 7674774" data-attributes="member: 6794198">First, a warlord could literally take a PC from the brink of death back to being unbloodied, or from bloodied to full health, from across the room, by using words alone, and not using magic, to negate the narrative effect of enemies trying, and succeeding, to cause damage to them. That is not a matter of opinion, but fact. You are entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts. The fact is, warlords forced you to reinterpret past narrative events in order to rationalize their abilities. That is anti-immersion by definition. It's also ridiculous.Rodney has plenty of good products to his credit, but that is irrelevant. You have no idea who everyone is on this website, and even if Gary Gygax were to come here and post anonymously, his words and pedigree do not automatically make him right on every topic, or even any topic. What you are saying is that you believe the logical fallacy of an argument by authority. Rodney is an authority on the topic of D&D, therefore his opinions are inherently right.Wrong.</blockquote>