Lol. It may have been. I was in a hurry to go apply medication and change a surgical dressing and , not being a player of video games, it never crossed my mind.Jein. They asked for top three games - unspecified - that you played on the same page and immediately following them asking about video games. The implication for me was that the question was about video games.
The question is more "How important is it that YOU be that in-charge character most of the time?"...at least, that's how I read it.Something that came up in a session earlier reminded me of how much I hate one of the utterly thousand percent useless questions on the survey that keeps coming up.
Something like "How important is it for you to take charge & lead the party" not at all somewhat very important".
[...]
To answer the question, it's of critical importance well beyond extremely important for some characters to take charge & direct the battle in addition the inverse for other characters at times.
Unfortunately in the current climate it's extermely unlikely that any setting based on a non-European culture would be published.I totally forgot to write-in Al-Qadim (or was that a choice?). I completely skipped buying the setting when it came out but, as I'm an Arabic linguist now, I bought all the Al-Qadim stuff off of ebay, all of which was in incredible shape, way back in 2015.
That setting is loads of fun. It oozes style and fun. The mini-boxed set adventures are amazing. Maybe they don't need a 5th edition book for it, but I seriously think that different Earth cultures need representation in D&D. It's a definite plus of the leatherette guidebooks for 2e that represented many cultures in Europe besides the standard medieval setting.
While I very strongly agree with this, some people apparently get profoundly offended when any non-European setting is published and WotC is far, far too adverse to controversy to publish Al-Qadim, Maztica, or Kara Tur in the current cultural/political climate.I totally forgot to write-in Al-Qadim (or was that a choice?). I completely skipped buying the setting when it came out but, as I'm an Arabic linguist now, I bought all the Al-Qadim stuff off of ebay, all of which was in incredible shape, way back in 2015.
That setting is loads of fun. It oozes style and fun. The mini-boxed set adventures are amazing. Maybe they don't need a 5th edition book for it, but I seriously think that different Earth cultures need representation in D&D. It's a definite plus of the leatherette guidebooks for 2e that represented many cultures in Europe besides the standard medieval setting.
No, not really. Were WotC hire the appropriate cultural consultans and sensitivity writers, a non-European setting would likely be greatly welcomed.While I very strongly agree with this, some people apparently get profoundly offended when any non-European setting is published and WotC is far, far too adverse to controversy to publish Al-Qadim, Maztica, or Kara Tur in the current cultural/political climate.
No, the settings are not viewed as inherently racist. The presentation of those settings are fraught with unwitting racist stereotypes, exotification, and othering. There may be something to salvage, but it's going to take a bit of an overhaul and better presentation. Fortunately, with Zakhara, Kara-Tur, and Maztica being a part of the Forgotten Realms, there's a built in licence to overhaul those sub-settings—the Time of Troubles (for Kara-Tur, which came out in 1e), the Shadoweave becoming a thing, the Spellplague, the calendar progressing 100 years, and then the Sundering.There was a huge, long, very heated thread here back in the Spring about it. Suffice it to say I really wish they'd continue those settings, but some people feel very strongly that those settings are inherently racist. The controversy even lead to WotC to put a disclaimer on .pdf sales of old AD&D materials.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.