Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New D&D WotC survey! On classes.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 8383827" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>I'd disagree. 3.x put the mechanics into the flavour, 4e put flavour into the mechanics. 5e's written like 3.X but keeps at least some of 4e.</p><p></p><p>To illustrate the difference, the 4e wizard had a number of at will/cantrip attacks for various elements. What type of damage they did was only different by a single word and their name in a consistent statblock - but they differed in what they did.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The frost one in the PHB attacked a single target and slowed them by chilling them. (If you recognise this as Ray of Frost in 5e have a cookie; the spell also existed in 3.5 but did damage and nothing else)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The fire one in the PHB was a small ball of fire that attacked a 3*3 area because fire flares</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The first electrical one was Storm Pillar - a spell that didn't actually make any attack rolls but created a tesla coil that blocked a square and zapped anyone who tried to move past it. </li> </ul><p>Each had a name and a single sentence of description. But the flavour was in the mechanics and because one was cold and another electrical they did different things in the world that went beyond their damage type. All of those spells had uses and you could only take a couple.</p><p></p><p>For some reason people considered it blander to have different effects on the world than to have a paragraph of text obscuring the mechanics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 8383827, member: 87792"] I'd disagree. 3.x put the mechanics into the flavour, 4e put flavour into the mechanics. 5e's written like 3.X but keeps at least some of 4e. To illustrate the difference, the 4e wizard had a number of at will/cantrip attacks for various elements. What type of damage they did was only different by a single word and their name in a consistent statblock - but they differed in what they did. [LIST] [*]The frost one in the PHB attacked a single target and slowed them by chilling them. (If you recognise this as Ray of Frost in 5e have a cookie; the spell also existed in 3.5 but did damage and nothing else) [*]The fire one in the PHB was a small ball of fire that attacked a 3*3 area because fire flares [*]The first electrical one was Storm Pillar - a spell that didn't actually make any attack rolls but created a tesla coil that blocked a square and zapped anyone who tried to move past it. [/LIST] Each had a name and a single sentence of description. But the flavour was in the mechanics and because one was cold and another electrical they did different things in the world that went beyond their damage type. All of those spells had uses and you could only take a couple. For some reason people considered it blander to have different effects on the world than to have a paragraph of text obscuring the mechanics. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New D&D WotC survey! On classes.
Top