Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mirtek" data-source="post: 8284321" data-attributes="member: 40810">Then the current changes would be the second time.Because 5e walked back from 4e deliberately right into the &quot;ugliness&quot; they are now trying to walk back from.5e dialed back big time on decades of developement on the &quot;always evil races&quot; to stamp out any nuances and put them firmly back into the &quot;always evil&quot; camp.The&nbsp; had Cattie Brie be reborn with a divine edict from Mielikki to put all goblins to the sword. They flat out stated that slaying Baby goblins is fine in a novel for crying out loud. They decided to dust the kingdom of many arrows so that there would be no more bastion of civilized orcs.They made them into religious nuts in Volos' that go crazy over a pantheon that was hardly ever mentioned in decades. Then marketing suddenly saw that these changes were not as well received as the, thought and now they're just doing a 180°</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mirtek, post: 8284321, member: 40810"] Then the current changes would be the second time. Because 5e walked back from 4e deliberately right into the "ugliness" they are now trying to walk back from. 5e dialed back big time on decades of developement on the "always evil races" to stamp out any nuances and put them firmly back into the "always evil" camp. The had Cattie Brie be reborn with a divine edict from Mielikki to put all goblins to the sword. They flat out stated that slaying Baby goblins is fine in a novel for crying out loud. They decided to dust the kingdom of many arrows so that there would be no more bastion of civilized orcs. They made them into religious nuts in Volos' that go crazy over a pantheon that was hardly ever mentioned in decades. Then marketing suddenly saw that these changes were not as well received as the, thought and now they're just doing a 180° [/QUOTE]

Verification