D&D (2024) (+) New Edition Changes for Inclusivity (discuss possibilities)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because Lovecraft is a reallife white supremacist, I prefer RPGs distance themselves away from his fiction.

One thing all fascists and other autocrats have in common is a pessimistic view of humanity.
So does that mean that all pessimistic views of humanity are inherently fascist?
 

log in or register to remove this ad



So does that mean that all pessimistic views of humanity are inherently fascist?
Some works are clearly a warning, so as to avoid a dystopia.

By contrast, Lovecraft embraces dehumanization and totalitarianism.

In reallife, Lovecraft obsesses about white supremacism and advocates for German N*zism.

Compare Magic The Gathering that officially deleted cards because of even an unintentional confluence of such tropes.
 
Last edited:


And yet American society has been pretty tolerant of intolerance up until about 10 years ago with zero movement towards being destroyed by the intolerant. In fact, the intolerant were marginalized and made virtually irrelevant up until about 4 years ago when the intolerance of the intolerant hit a new high and invigorated the intolerant.

I don't buy the premise of that paradox.

I in no way support intolerance and think we should move to marginalize it again so that it's back to being less than it is today.
 


And yet American society has been pretty tolerant of intolerance up until about 10 years ago with zero movement towards being destroyed by the intolerant.

Except for the war fought because of it in the 1860s? Or the lawfully elected legislatures murdered en masse in several states in the 1870s by the racists? Or the presidential election that almost went out of control and was saved by formally letting the south be officially racist for another 60 years? (The north just did it unofficially). Or the rise of the Dixiecrats and the fight for civil rights from the 1940s to 1960s with the assassinations and brutally suppressed peaceful protests and the riots?
 

Anti-inclusive content
Except for the war fought about it in the 1860s? Or the lawfully elected legislatures murdered en masse in several states in the 1870s by the racists? Or the presidential election that almost went out of control and was saved by formally letting the south be officially racist for another 60 years? (The north just did it unofficially). Or the rise of the Dixiecrats and the fight for civil rights from the 1940s to 1960s with the assassinations and brutally suppressed peaceful protests and the riots?
There's a big difference between engaging in physical acts of intolerance and verbal ones. Physical acts. Vandalism, assaults, murders, slavery, etc. should be vigorously opposed and those engaging in them punished.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top