Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New errata for core books, dated 7/2/2008
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 4385458" data-attributes="member: 5889"><p>Hehe, I appreciate the confidence, but my analysis take a bit of time and work has been draining my life lately.</p><p></p><p>I will say I am very happy WOTC has taken note of some of the major issues with the challenges, those being that the DCs for each check are too high, aid another is too powerful, allowing off skills at a hard DC actually hurts the party, and that the success/failure ratios don't work well.</p><p></p><p>There are still inherent problems such as the sensitivity, I'll have to see how that pans out.</p><p></p><p>For those saying the challenge is now too easy, bear in mind that you can always make it harder. Perhaps similar to a normal combat, the players are supposed to nearly always win those basic challenges. But a DM can always bump the DC up a notch.</p><p></p><p>Its always easier for a DM to run an easy challenge that the party laughs through and increases the next run, then run a brutal challenge that has the player complaining about unfairness.</p><p></p><p>I have no plans to abandon my own system, but for those who like the layout of the original, I'm glad to see official changes made.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As for the other changes, I will say that while I appreciate the quick errata, I am disappointed with how much errata is in the monsters manual. There are some serious changes in there, often nearly halving a creature's hitpoints or nearly doubling its damage. Its one thing to change something in the phb that everyone knows and can remember. But often times I'll just grab something out of the MM for fun, and having to go and look up some errata is pretty annoying.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 4385458, member: 5889"] Hehe, I appreciate the confidence, but my analysis take a bit of time and work has been draining my life lately. I will say I am very happy WOTC has taken note of some of the major issues with the challenges, those being that the DCs for each check are too high, aid another is too powerful, allowing off skills at a hard DC actually hurts the party, and that the success/failure ratios don't work well. There are still inherent problems such as the sensitivity, I'll have to see how that pans out. For those saying the challenge is now too easy, bear in mind that you can always make it harder. Perhaps similar to a normal combat, the players are supposed to nearly always win those basic challenges. But a DM can always bump the DC up a notch. Its always easier for a DM to run an easy challenge that the party laughs through and increases the next run, then run a brutal challenge that has the player complaining about unfairness. I have no plans to abandon my own system, but for those who like the layout of the original, I'm glad to see official changes made. As for the other changes, I will say that while I appreciate the quick errata, I am disappointed with how much errata is in the monsters manual. There are some serious changes in there, often nearly halving a creature's hitpoints or nearly doubling its damage. Its one thing to change something in the phb that everyone knows and can remember. But often times I'll just grab something out of the MM for fun, and having to go and look up some errata is pretty annoying. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New errata for core books, dated 7/2/2008
Top