• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

New FAQ at Wizards - Behind the Screen with magic item creation


log in or register to remove this ad

It also states that mithral armor is considered one category lighter for proficiency purposes, something that's been brought up recently again. A good update, methinks.

Pinotage
 


Pinotage said:
It also states that mithral armor is considered one category lighter for proficiency purposes, something that's been brought up recently again. A good update, methinks.

Pinotage

So if you have something thats light armor, and make it out of mithral, is it considered no armor? Or to say, could someone with no armor proficientcies use it without penalty? :o
 

darthkilmor said:
So if you have something thats light armor, and make it out of mithral, is it considered no armor? Or to say, could someone with no armor proficientcies use it without penalty? :o

Heh. No, mithral light armor still counts as light armor so it would require light armor proficiency to use. :)

Pinotage
 

Pinotage said:
It also states that mithral armor is considered one category lighter for proficiency purposes, something that's been brought up recently again. A good update, methinks.

Pinotage

Oh, that's wonderful!
 


Patryn of Elvenshae said:
He also calls it out as his own house rule. Well done on that end, at least! :D

not exactly.:

"The simplest answer—
and the one that the Sage expects most players and DMs use—
is that mithral armor is treated as one category lighter for all
purposes, including proficiency. This isn’t exactly what the
DUNGEON MASTER’s Guide says, but it’s a reasonable
interpretation of the intent of the rule (and it’s supported by a
number of precedents, including the descriptions of various
specific mithral armors described on page 220 of the DUNGEON
MASTER’s Guide and a variety of NPC stat blocks)."

Note that he states that this is an "interpretation" not a house rule, but he also does not say it is the ONLY answer or even that this is the OFFICIAL answer. It's more like advice.
 

Artoomis said:
Note that he states that this is an "interpretation" not a house rule, but he also does not say it is the ONLY answer or even that this is the OFFICIAL answer. It's more like advice.

Wouldn't it just be so wonderful if they included that clause on all of the FAQ and Sage rulings? Ahh, the problems that would solve.

On the other hand, I suppose that might take some of the fun out of this board. :)
 


Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top