Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Moon-Lancer" data-source="post: 3079959" data-attributes="member: 35798">I think the point was suspension of full reality. If one wants to assume that you still fall after teleport, I think that’s a bit anal, so I think taking Planetary movement is just fine if that’s the way sage wants to play it. The point is that taking falling damage in the first place is ridicules, so any use of this spell makes it go splat, simple as that.LegildurI think ina works regardless of faq or not. yeah im one of those. im also one of those guys who thinks that towershields grant cover 360 Degrease all Degrees, and that vop clarics can have holy symbles <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />Thanee, i think hyp said it best"What can you define your position relative to? If someone falls off a cliff and teleports to the ground, he takes falling damage. If he falls off a cliff, stands on his shield (air-surfer style), and then teleports to the ground, is he not-moving relative to the shield?"sage wanted to be all technical for those type of people, but frogot about how fast planets move.</blockquote>