Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9412665" data-attributes="member: 93670">I assume it to be related to you wanting to declare the literal example & quote from crawford a mere "wall of text".  Wotc realized paladin was OP "early on" yet decided to do nothing about it to the point that they were not even willing to admit it in a way that would give GM's a solid defense for when a player with a paladin complains they feel "nerfed" by the GM's attempt to fix it for wotc.☆changes directly to the class or via monster changesThe comment was about player reactions to the fix from GM's... this is wildly unrelated to a statement like "As a GM I am absolutely livid  that wotc threw every gm under the bus of needing to deal with this problem for them without so much as a tweet or blog post somewhere to provide us support when players lash out in frustration citing "wotc did polls they know what is fun" & similar when having to fix problems wotc knew about very early on but couldn't manage to admit."  I've had more than one player say things like that and I'd be shocked if paladin was the only example wotc knew was a problem</blockquote>