Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9413343" data-attributes="member: 93670">I would be surprisred if they do anything other than throw their hand up &amp; do nothing substantial about it with the PHB &amp; kick the can down the line till the november 12th DLC starts populating shelves.100% my most memorable interaction with a player while running AL games went like this:[spoiler]I had never seen them before &amp; they were not one of the regulars so SomeGuy will be their nameSomeguy:&nbsp; &quot;I have this printout from sage advice that I want to make sure you will follow before I join&nbsp; your table since my PC is kinda built around it&quot;Me: &quot;No.&nbsp; Try one of the other tables, I've got a few regulars that are expected to show up closer to 6&quot;(it was like 15-20min till)SomeGuy: &quot;b.. .but you didn't even look&quot;Me: &quot;No I did not.&nbsp; My [completely empty] table is full as you can seeMe to all the GM's starting to setup: &quot;Hey guys, SomeGuy here has a character built around a printout from sage advice &amp; he wants to know if you will respect the ruling from crawford he built a PC around?&quot;Three other GMs:&quot;uh... yea... I'm full up&quot;Nobody cared to find out what was on the printout or look at the PC.&nbsp; The guy wound up making a new PC &amp; joined someone's table[/spoiler]Sage advice could have been valuable if it was about the RAI or early previews into the actual errata that 5e has so dearly needed for the last decade rather than &quot;JC's unofficial soapbox&quot; as it was described <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/new-jeremy-crawford-interviews.705650/post-9413187" target="_blank">earlier</a>, it was far from useful though.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9413343, member: 93670"] I would be surprisred if they do anything other than throw their hand up & do nothing substantial about it with the PHB & kick the can down the line till the november 12th DLC starts populating shelves. 100% my most memorable interaction with a player while running AL games went like this: [spoiler] I had never seen them before & they were not one of the regulars so SomeGuy will be their name Someguy: "I have this printout from sage advice that I want to make sure you will follow before I join your table since my PC is kinda built around it" Me: "No. Try one of the other tables, I've got a few regulars that are expected to show up closer to 6"(it was like 15-20min till) SomeGuy: "b.. .but you didn't even look" Me: "No I did not. My [completely empty] table is full as you can see Me to all the GM's starting to setup: "Hey guys, SomeGuy here has a character built around a printout from sage advice & he wants to know if you will respect the ruling from crawford he built a PC around?" Three other GMs:"uh... yea... I'm full up" Nobody cared to find out what was on the printout or look at the PC. The guy wound up making a new PC & joined someone's table [/spoiler] Sage advice could have been valuable if it was about the RAI or early previews into the actual errata that 5e has so dearly needed for the last decade rather than "JC's unofficial soapbox" as it was described [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/new-jeremy-crawford-interviews.705650/post-9413187']earlier[/URL], it was far from useful though. [/QUOTE]

Verification