Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scott Christian" data-source="post: 9414952" data-attributes="member: 6901101">No, it's not. If you have read any of my comments on any of these forums, you'll know my standpoint is that classes don't need to be perfectly balanced, challenges can be made via thoughtful and knowledgeable DM, and the entire character system should be based on choices.It's not a critique, it's a prediction. Hence, why I specifically wrote out the definition of broken:Again, it's not a problem. (Especially at my table.) It is a prediction on how others will perceive the 2024 classes within a year after the game is released.When you hear Mearls talk about how they haven't tried or even thought of all the combinations, then you can infer that there is probably going to be a lot of loopy combos. Again, they can't test everything. It is unreasonable to expect them to. But if you have increased the class's capacity to do "cool things" and increased the spell list, then odds are there is going to be an increase in powerful combos.</blockquote>