Oh, I'd agree. My personal preference may be to err on the side of being a second bananna. I fully understand that not everyone, and not even half of everyone would agree with me. Riding that line between 'special' and lore breaking is a tall order. I suppose that is why I have not done more than browse through settings with strong main characters (Serenity!), but it can be done (Star Wars!)
My issue with using d20 is magic. Even cantrips are more magical than we see in the book. Gandalf does not continually cast flashy spells. Nobody approaches his power with magic.
It is a shame the licence will be restricted so. Setting books relating to the Ages of Middle Earth could rock very hard indeed. It would be a way to introduce more. . .wonder. This has to do intensely with my personal opinion that the Third age is post apocalyptical. Things are old and falling down in the Third age. It might be much more *magical* to adventure in the First age!
Jay
My issue with using d20 is magic. Even cantrips are more magical than we see in the book. Gandalf does not continually cast flashy spells. Nobody approaches his power with magic.
It is a shame the licence will be restricted so. Setting books relating to the Ages of Middle Earth could rock very hard indeed. It would be a way to introduce more. . .wonder. This has to do intensely with my personal opinion that the Third age is post apocalyptical. Things are old and falling down in the Third age. It might be much more *magical* to adventure in the First age!
Jay