Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Miniatures... Info?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dire Bare" data-source="post: 4664396" data-attributes="member: 18182"><p>For the sake of argument, let's say that we are all in agreement that no matter how good or poor the sculpt/paint job of the nightwalker was, that it ended up being a poor choice for an uncommon slot.</p><p></p><p>Doesn't change what Charles is saying, that a company trying to gauge what their customers want and providing that is actually rocket science (or at least, quite difficult). Do our customers want a nightwalker mini? What rarity do we make it? Will we get the stats "right"? Will the concept sketch we think is cool translate into a good sculpt? How will the paint job look? (especially on a monster that is a pure black "hole" in reality) How will the mini fit in with the rest of the set? Soooooo many variables.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When you claim these sorts of issues aren't "rocket science", you are essentially saying that the folks behind the D&D minis line are idiots and that you could do better. Heck, that a child could do better. And that is insulting. It's also arrogant, condescending, and flat out incorrect. My counter-claim that it *is* rocket science does not imply that WotC can't do better, that's a ridiculous leap there. WotC most certainly can learn from their mistakes and produce better product in the future, and I imagine that they will do just that. If they were incapable of doing better, all of my minis would have "Harbinger" quality . . . .</p><p></p><p>I own quite a few D&D Minis, although I've never bought by the caseload. Probably 4-5 boosters per set plus the various starter sets (and the icons). There are many of the minis I own that I think are sucktackular, either in sculpt, paint job, or both. There are minis that I have too much of, probably because the distribution was off (such as the nightwalker, I do have too many of those). But overall, I think WotC has done an amazing job with the D&D Minis line, and I realize the complexity of pulling this off.</p><p></p><p>If it were easy, not "rocket science", then WotC would have a lot more competition in this area instead of just the, now defunct, WizKids.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dire Bare, post: 4664396, member: 18182"] For the sake of argument, let's say that we are all in agreement that no matter how good or poor the sculpt/paint job of the nightwalker was, that it ended up being a poor choice for an uncommon slot. Doesn't change what Charles is saying, that a company trying to gauge what their customers want and providing that is actually rocket science (or at least, quite difficult). Do our customers want a nightwalker mini? What rarity do we make it? Will we get the stats "right"? Will the concept sketch we think is cool translate into a good sculpt? How will the paint job look? (especially on a monster that is a pure black "hole" in reality) How will the mini fit in with the rest of the set? Soooooo many variables. When you claim these sorts of issues aren't "rocket science", you are essentially saying that the folks behind the D&D minis line are idiots and that you could do better. Heck, that a child could do better. And that is insulting. It's also arrogant, condescending, and flat out incorrect. My counter-claim that it *is* rocket science does not imply that WotC can't do better, that's a ridiculous leap there. WotC most certainly can learn from their mistakes and produce better product in the future, and I imagine that they will do just that. If they were incapable of doing better, all of my minis would have "Harbinger" quality . . . . I own quite a few D&D Minis, although I've never bought by the caseload. Probably 4-5 boosters per set plus the various starter sets (and the icons). There are many of the minis I own that I think are sucktackular, either in sculpt, paint job, or both. There are minis that I have too much of, probably because the distribution was off (such as the nightwalker, I do have too many of those). But overall, I think WotC has done an amazing job with the D&D Minis line, and I realize the complexity of pulling this off. If it were easy, not "rocket science", then WotC would have a lot more competition in this area instead of just the, now defunct, WizKids. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
New Miniatures... Info?
Top