Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sammael" data-source="post: 4665909" data-attributes="member: 4475">And, naturally, because of your NDA (how long are those things in effect, anyway? even the CIA opens up its archives after so many years...), you cannot tell me exactly what content was inaccurate.After spending upward of 5000 dollars on D&D miniatures, following the line intently for years, and participating in competitive events, I thought I had it right. Obviously not. I apologize. Let's talk specifics: for instance, who is responsible for the creation of the Spawn of Tiamat? Who thought it was a good idea to include a metric ton of them over the course of several sets instead of some other minis which were in great demand? Is this not a matter of "traction?" If the mini design process is so disconnected from the other design processes, how come they came out in sets promptly after Monster Manual IV (which wasted almost 40 pages on the said Spawn of Tiamat, including such gems as the Whitespawn Iceskidder)? Why was one of the precious huge slots in War of the Dragon Queen used up on something so bizarre as the Bluespawn Godslayer (usually referred to as "The Blue Barney")?I have many more questions, but I'll wait until I get some answers to the above ones before I ask them.EDIT: Obviously, if communication between WotC and the fans were better, I wouldn't have to base my beliefs on wrong assumptions. While you were there, communication was great. Everyone just had to post "WOOF!" and you answered people's questions promptly (including several of my own questions).</blockquote>

Verification