Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New One D&D Playtest Document: 77 Pages, 7 Classes, & More!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9058791" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>Gotta say, WotC are mostly doing a good job of renewing my faith in One D&D with this playtest packet. I'd sort of given up after the last two, with a "Not for me" assumption re: One D&D, but this is much better.</p><p></p><p>The Bard is just like, a long string of correct decisions which will make the class, and the game, easier and more interesting to play. They also show a much deeper understanding of real balance than earlier designs. As such of course I expect the audience to hate it and WotC to have to take it all back, but if that doesn't happen... (Magical Secrets, Dancer subclass, where were these designers earlier?!).</p><p></p><p>The Druid shows a similarly excellent eye, just really good stuff here. Just good design and Circle of the Sea kicks unexpected ass.</p><p></p><p>Monks is okay, but needs work. Still balanced around stunning strike. Short swords MIA for some reason.</p><p></p><p>Paladin generally seems solid, though boo to nerfing the Ancients aura! Divine Smite costing a Bonus Action is going to have to go, though, as it makes a weird mess of the action economy.</p><p></p><p>Ranger is Ranger, and as ever, fans who I am fairly convinced have never played a Ranger have convinced WotC to include an awful feature, but whaddya gonna do, eh? It's Ranger. It's going to be an overcomplicated, weirdly bland mess.</p><p></p><p>Rogue seems mostly okay though some of the new ways to use SA are a bit odd.</p><p></p><p>They've got a lot more stuff refreshing or partially-refreshing on a Short Rest, I see, which I guess is their somewhat questionable attempt to balance Long Rest and Short Rest characters by further encouraging Short Rests. It will fail miserably as long as Short Rests remain 1 hour. This is just bad silly design, and I hope they get over it. If they don't, I suspect whichever company does are more likely to get the groups I play in's business, because every DM I know dislikes this (and most players).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9058791, member: 18"] Gotta say, WotC are mostly doing a good job of renewing my faith in One D&D with this playtest packet. I'd sort of given up after the last two, with a "Not for me" assumption re: One D&D, but this is much better. The Bard is just like, a long string of correct decisions which will make the class, and the game, easier and more interesting to play. They also show a much deeper understanding of real balance than earlier designs. As such of course I expect the audience to hate it and WotC to have to take it all back, but if that doesn't happen... (Magical Secrets, Dancer subclass, where were these designers earlier?!). The Druid shows a similarly excellent eye, just really good stuff here. Just good design and Circle of the Sea kicks unexpected ass. Monks is okay, but needs work. Still balanced around stunning strike. Short swords MIA for some reason. Paladin generally seems solid, though boo to nerfing the Ancients aura! Divine Smite costing a Bonus Action is going to have to go, though, as it makes a weird mess of the action economy. Ranger is Ranger, and as ever, fans who I am fairly convinced have never played a Ranger have convinced WotC to include an awful feature, but whaddya gonna do, eh? It's Ranger. It's going to be an overcomplicated, weirdly bland mess. Rogue seems mostly okay though some of the new ways to use SA are a bit odd. They've got a lot more stuff refreshing or partially-refreshing on a Short Rest, I see, which I guess is their somewhat questionable attempt to balance Long Rest and Short Rest characters by further encouraging Short Rests. It will fail miserably as long as Short Rests remain 1 hour. This is just bad silly design, and I hope they get over it. If they don't, I suspect whichever company does are more likely to get the groups I play in's business, because every DM I know dislikes this (and most players). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New One D&D Playtest Document: 77 Pages, 7 Classes, & More!
Top