Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="EthanSental" data-source="post: 8988970" data-attributes="member: 6790058">if/when DoaM UA comes put and we try it I can see my table/players going like this…Rogue goes first roles a 15, ah a miss, he parried you stab at the last second.&nbsp; The Druid swing and rolls a 16, also a miss as he blocked it with his shield.&nbsp; So the players are paying attention and getting an idea of the number need to hit and do roll damage.&nbsp; Fighter comes up rolls a 14 and i get to say…you grazed him with your greatsword or crossbow bolt and you do 3 damage.&nbsp; In my minds eye, I see the rogue and Druid player looking and wondering…he rolled lower than me and still did damage.&nbsp;&nbsp; At some point, mentally we could get used to it cause it feels kinda like those old to hit charts in 1e, 2e days with the number getting easier to hit for a fighter than say a mages to hit charts, and their improvement to the chart at varying levels. Not so big of a change once I think of it in that way.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EthanSental, post: 8988970, member: 6790058"] if/when DoaM UA comes put and we try it I can see my table/players going like this… Rogue goes first roles a 15, ah a miss, he parried you stab at the last second. The Druid swing and rolls a 16, also a miss as he blocked it with his shield. So the players are paying attention and getting an idea of the number need to hit and do roll damage. Fighter comes up rolls a 14 and i get to say…you grazed him with your greatsword or crossbow bolt and you do 3 damage. In my minds eye, I see the rogue and Druid player looking and wondering…he rolled lower than me and still did damage. At some point, mentally we could get used to it cause it feels kinda like those old to hit charts in 1e, 2e days with the number getting easier to hit for a fighter than say a mages to hit charts, and their improvement to the chart at varying levels. Not so big of a change once I think of it in that way. [/QUOTE]

Verification