Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Spellcasting Blocks for Monsters --- Why?!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8661313" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>But, when you make errors in chess, are you making play errors - as in making a bad move - or rules errors as in moving your knight to the wrong square or moving a rook diagonally? I imagine it's the former, not the latter. So, your example doesn't really say what you think it says. You make bad moves in chess, which is fine. Making a bad move is expected, really, or we'd all be grand masters. But, you don't make mechanical errors, I assume.</p><p></p><p>Yet, you admit that you cannot keep the rules straight during play. Again, I hardly think you're alone here. Watch any live play and you'll see DM's with gobs and gobs of play experience making mechanical mistakes all the time. It's like I said with the 1-2-1 rule. Sure, that's a fine rule until someone runs or you try to calculate the range to a target that isn't exactly othagonal or diagonal to you. I guarantee that everyone makes mistakes with that system and makes them all the time. Which is why we don't use that system anymore. Any gains in accuracy you might get with 1-2-1 are lost through user error.</p><p></p><p>The same goes with caster enemies. Running a caster is complicated. Running a high level caster, when you haven't actually played that character, in the middle of combat is so complicated that I would bet dollars to donuts that 90% of DM's using those rules will make mistakes. Most will be minor mistakes, but, they'll make mistakes. We all do. Because I wrote the adventure a couple of weeks ago, then last week's session got cancelled because of real life, so, I haven't looked at the stat block in two weeks and we're three hours into a four hour session when the encounter begins. Of course mistakes are going to be made.</p><p></p><p>So, what's the point of having these detailed rules that are only making play more difficult and mostly won't even see play at the table? An 18th level caster has what, 25-30 spells known at any given time? At the absolute outside the DM is going to use 10 of them and most likely 3-5. So, most of those rules are just taking up space and will never see actual use at the table.</p><p></p><p>The whole, "The statblock is the in game description of the monster" really needs to finally be put to bed. That was only ever true in 3e.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 8661313, member: 22779"] But, when you make errors in chess, are you making play errors - as in making a bad move - or rules errors as in moving your knight to the wrong square or moving a rook diagonally? I imagine it's the former, not the latter. So, your example doesn't really say what you think it says. You make bad moves in chess, which is fine. Making a bad move is expected, really, or we'd all be grand masters. But, you don't make mechanical errors, I assume. Yet, you admit that you cannot keep the rules straight during play. Again, I hardly think you're alone here. Watch any live play and you'll see DM's with gobs and gobs of play experience making mechanical mistakes all the time. It's like I said with the 1-2-1 rule. Sure, that's a fine rule until someone runs or you try to calculate the range to a target that isn't exactly othagonal or diagonal to you. I guarantee that everyone makes mistakes with that system and makes them all the time. Which is why we don't use that system anymore. Any gains in accuracy you might get with 1-2-1 are lost through user error. The same goes with caster enemies. Running a caster is complicated. Running a high level caster, when you haven't actually played that character, in the middle of combat is so complicated that I would bet dollars to donuts that 90% of DM's using those rules will make mistakes. Most will be minor mistakes, but, they'll make mistakes. We all do. Because I wrote the adventure a couple of weeks ago, then last week's session got cancelled because of real life, so, I haven't looked at the stat block in two weeks and we're three hours into a four hour session when the encounter begins. Of course mistakes are going to be made. So, what's the point of having these detailed rules that are only making play more difficult and mostly won't even see play at the table? An 18th level caster has what, 25-30 spells known at any given time? At the absolute outside the DM is going to use 10 of them and most likely 3-5. So, most of those rules are just taking up space and will never see actual use at the table. The whole, "The statblock is the in game description of the monster" really needs to finally be put to bed. That was only ever true in 3e. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Spellcasting Blocks for Monsters --- Why?!
Top