Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Spellcasting Blocks for Monsters --- Why?!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8662428" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Like every other thing in the 5E game (and the 4E game, 3E game etc.)... whether any one bit is better or worse, is useful or isn't, is difficult to use or easy to use... it ALL comes down to how the DM and the players approach their game. And as all tables approach the game differently, feel certain parts of the game are more important than others, feel certain rules are more important than others, feel certain styles of roleplay are more important than others... there will never be an agreement about what truly is or isn't good or necessary with any potential change.</p><p></p><p>Something like <em>Prestidigitation</em> is one example. Does that need to be in a "caster statblock"?</p><p></p><p>- For some people they will say 'No, not at all'... because for them the caster spellblock is there purely to represent the "enemy combatant" the party will be engaging with, and thus any non-combat spells for an enemy that will only be lasting like 3 rounds before being killed are a waste of space.</p><p></p><p>- For other people they will say "Yes, absolutely!", because they will see the character that has that "caster statblock" as an actual character to interact with on a personal level (granted, a 'non-player' character), so the expectation is that this character will absolutely see use outside of combat and thus we need to see all of what this character is capable of and can have at their disposal for any other type of encounter the PCs might have with them.</p><p></p><p>- For still others, they will say "No, not at all..." like the first group, but for the same reason as the second group-- the DM knows this 'non-player' character has a body of abilities outside of strictly combat... but it's <em>not necessary</em> for it to be written down. If the players happen to interact with this NPC spellcaster outside of a combat scenario, the DM can just decide in the moment what the character can do. The statblock isn't a full protrait of everything the NPC knows and is capable of... it's merely a snapshot of some of the <em>most likely</em> things it can do for the DM's ease-of-use in the moment. But the DM can change things at any time if it seems likely. In the moment if the DM thinks "this spellcaster can wave their hand and light all the candle in the room"... the DM can just have the NPC do that, even if <em>Prestidigitation</em> wasn't down "officially" in the statblock as a spell for that caster.</p><p></p><p>Now here's the thing (in relation to what I said in the original paragraph)... every one of these three options are going to have almost every person have a visceral reaction to probably one of them that will amount to "ARE YOU KIDDING?!? NO, NO, NO! THAT'S NOT HOW THE GAME IS TO BE PLAYED!!!" For some people, what is written down is sacrosanct-- it is the display of the reality of the world. For others, what is written down is just what will be necessary to use for game purposes-- the game needs certain things to be present to play the game effectively, and anything outside of game usefulness is just getting in the way. And for others, the game world and the characters in it are so broad and far-reaching that it is <em>impossible</em> to quantify it all by just writing it down-- so the truth and the reality for what is happening at the table can come into being as it happens through the impulses and imaginations of the DM and players. The truth isn't set until it shows up at the table in the game, and everything written down behind the screen are 'Schrodinger's DM Notes'-- both existing and not existing until the it shows up in game.</p><p></p><p>And none of us are correct, and none of us are incorrect. It's all down to what we personally want and need. And at no point will WotC be able to feed all three groups equally... all they can do is decide what they think will be most useful to the most amount of people... leaning in the direction of inexperienced D&D players first (under the expectation than more experienced players can do things on their own if what WotC gives is not to their preferences.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8662428, member: 7006"] Like every other thing in the 5E game (and the 4E game, 3E game etc.)... whether any one bit is better or worse, is useful or isn't, is difficult to use or easy to use... it ALL comes down to how the DM and the players approach their game. And as all tables approach the game differently, feel certain parts of the game are more important than others, feel certain rules are more important than others, feel certain styles of roleplay are more important than others... there will never be an agreement about what truly is or isn't good or necessary with any potential change. Something like [I]Prestidigitation[/I] is one example. Does that need to be in a "caster statblock"? - For some people they will say 'No, not at all'... because for them the caster spellblock is there purely to represent the "enemy combatant" the party will be engaging with, and thus any non-combat spells for an enemy that will only be lasting like 3 rounds before being killed are a waste of space. - For other people they will say "Yes, absolutely!", because they will see the character that has that "caster statblock" as an actual character to interact with on a personal level (granted, a 'non-player' character), so the expectation is that this character will absolutely see use outside of combat and thus we need to see all of what this character is capable of and can have at their disposal for any other type of encounter the PCs might have with them. - For still others, they will say "No, not at all..." like the first group, but for the same reason as the second group-- the DM knows this 'non-player' character has a body of abilities outside of strictly combat... but it's [I]not necessary[/I] for it to be written down. If the players happen to interact with this NPC spellcaster outside of a combat scenario, the DM can just decide in the moment what the character can do. The statblock isn't a full protrait of everything the NPC knows and is capable of... it's merely a snapshot of some of the [I]most likely[/I] things it can do for the DM's ease-of-use in the moment. But the DM can change things at any time if it seems likely. In the moment if the DM thinks "this spellcaster can wave their hand and light all the candle in the room"... the DM can just have the NPC do that, even if [I]Prestidigitation[/I] wasn't down "officially" in the statblock as a spell for that caster. Now here's the thing (in relation to what I said in the original paragraph)... every one of these three options are going to have almost every person have a visceral reaction to probably one of them that will amount to "ARE YOU KIDDING?!? NO, NO, NO! THAT'S NOT HOW THE GAME IS TO BE PLAYED!!!" For some people, what is written down is sacrosanct-- it is the display of the reality of the world. For others, what is written down is just what will be necessary to use for game purposes-- the game needs certain things to be present to play the game effectively, and anything outside of game usefulness is just getting in the way. And for others, the game world and the characters in it are so broad and far-reaching that it is [I]impossible[/I] to quantify it all by just writing it down-- so the truth and the reality for what is happening at the table can come into being as it happens through the impulses and imaginations of the DM and players. The truth isn't set until it shows up at the table in the game, and everything written down behind the screen are 'Schrodinger's DM Notes'-- both existing and not existing until the it shows up in game. And none of us are correct, and none of us are incorrect. It's all down to what we personally want and need. And at no point will WotC be able to feed all three groups equally... all they can do is decide what they think will be most useful to the most amount of people... leaning in the direction of inexperienced D&D players first (under the expectation than more experienced players can do things on their own if what WotC gives is not to their preferences.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Spellcasting Blocks for Monsters --- Why?!
Top