Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 7847386" data-attributes="member: 6777737">I mean, there are non-spellcasters listed in the document, too. Swapping spells overnight is powerful, but it's not that powerful. It's primary purpose is not punishing bad choices, with some benefit given to extremely narrow purpose-specific spells. Now you can pick up water breathing when you find out you need to go underwater in the next dungeon, for example. You're also limited to spells of the same level, which is a more significant limitation than it first appears.I'm not even sure it makes that much of a difference to limit it to 0th-5th level spells.It applies to anything. You cast flame strike and one target takes 1d8 radiant damage. Potent Spellcasting also didn't scale because cantrips do.I'm not particularly concerned with nerfing high level melee Clerics. In my experience, melee clerics don't exist past level 4. The lack of Extra Attack is too significant.It's playtest material. Adjust your expectations accordingly. That is to say, it should probably work exactly like Martial Adept.Probably, yes. It would mirror how Bard's Inspiration Dice work.It means that extra Ki points are almost never wasted, and most healing requires an action. Even a Paladin's Lay on Hands requires an action.Frenzy is a poorly designed ability. It should just be a 1/day ability that you can use to transform a rage into a frenzy. I'm also not willing to hold back concepts like exhaustion recovery because some people use multiclassing.It's still on the Ranger's spell list.I hate Thrown Weapon Fighting. Allowing thrown weapons to work with Extra Attack is simply how the game should already work. I don't know any table that didn't already allow thrown weapons to work like the first paragraph does -- thrown weapons are terrible anyways so it's not a useful limitation for balance. So it's just +1 damage which is terrible. It's taking a limited benefit that only applies to a secondary weapon. It would be acceptable if it said, "When you deal damage with a weapon that has the Thrown property, you deal +1 damage," but as written it's so narrow that it's useless. I hate fixes to core game rules from supplemental content like this because it looks like they're trying to say that you can only get the benefit of how the rules should have worked by selecting this special class feature.</blockquote>

Verification