Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Salthorae" data-source="post: 7848857" data-attributes="member: 1095">In the UA Article: Blind Fighting, Interception, Thrown Weapon, and Unarmed Fighting are all available to the three Fighting Style Feature classes: Fighter, Ranger, &amp; Paladin. The antecedent is clear if you read it as referring to Spellcasting header of the Spellcasting feature which Spell Versatility enhances. I get how that might not be immediately clear, but there is no reason to assume that versatility works differently than any of the other &quot;enhancement&quot; features in this article which ALL refer back to their original feature as what they are &quot;enhancing&quot;.This is a great point. Cantrips is a different class feature from Spellcasting, so RAW you shouldn't be able to use this to swap out Cantrips despite their &quot;rule tip&quot; sidebar. They'd need to specify in the Spell Versatility Feature that you can swap out &quot;any spell gained from either the Cantrip or Spellcasting&quot; feature. I think they're probably aiming for concision here, but the &quot;rule tip&quot; adds more words/wordiness to the article than just specifying &quot;either Cantrips or Spellcasting&quot; in Spell Versatility.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Salthorae, post: 7848857, member: 1095"] In the UA Article: Blind Fighting, Interception, Thrown Weapon, and Unarmed Fighting are all available to the three Fighting Style Feature classes: Fighter, Ranger, & Paladin. The antecedent is clear if you read it as referring to Spellcasting header of the Spellcasting feature which Spell Versatility enhances. I get how that might not be immediately clear, but there is no reason to assume that versatility works differently than any of the other "enhancement" features in this article which ALL refer back to their original feature as what they are "enhancing". This is a great point. Cantrips is a different class feature from Spellcasting, so RAW you shouldn't be able to use this to swap out Cantrips despite their "rule tip" sidebar. They'd need to specify in the Spell Versatility Feature that you can swap out "any spell gained from either the Cantrip or Spellcasting" feature. I think they're probably aiming for concision here, but the "rule tip" adds more words/wordiness to the article than just specifying "either Cantrips or Spellcasting" in Spell Versatility. [/QUOTE]

Verification