Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LuisCarlos17f" data-source="post: 7861010" data-attributes="member: 6802378">I like the idea of psionic subclasses, but I would suggest some changes.- I imagine wu jen as an occult subclass than psionic (occult classes from Pathfinder). And those taboos would too boring, annoying for game designers or useless in a videogame adaptation. - The name for psionic wizard should be mentalist, and a psionic rogue should be the lurker.- If the wilder will be a psionic sorcerer then the psychic enervation needs to be fixed, because it was not a fun gameplay. Maybe with suffering the dazed condition would be enough, because psionic power points was boring for the risk.- The ardent as psionic cousin of paladin should be a base class. It is a too cool concept what could allow creation of new stories about conflicts and love-hate relations with clerics and other divine spellcasters. Templars as ardents would be interesting enemies in Dark Sun. But I am afraid it will be only a paladin subclass.- D&D should use the idea of "archetypes" by Pathfinder where some class features are replaced, but the character is different since the first level. - In the past time ago I suggested the name "cofrater" ( = member of a brotherhood) for a class as ersatz of jedis from Star Wars. - I miss some ideas from psionic and occult class from Pathfinder, as the aegis class, or the medium and spiritualist from Pathfinder Occult Adventures. You can bet somebody will create the homebred version for 5th Ed or even to be used in their Ravenloft games. - Would Paizo dare to publish its own version for D&D 5th Ed of the new classes it created? - Batlemind as a warlord subclass? - Will be templars a cleric subclass in the future Dark Sun? I wouldn't blame WotC.- What would happen if a soulknife, a solarian (starfinder class), a jedi and protoss zealot enter a bar and..?</blockquote>

Verification