Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kannik" data-source="post: 7862724" data-attributes="member: 984">Count me in the camp who was excited for the direction expressed in the Mystic class.  I liked the idea of gathering together a thematically linked bevvy of powers that gave a versatile number of abilities tied to a point cost (something they can play around with and develop even further to add more flexibility and options), plus that gave a simple rider when choosing it as your focus.  It felt and played different in a very good way.*  I do hope they return to it and create a full class.That said, I also feel that something like a Psionic Warrior, Soul Knife, or similar works better as a subclass of one of the existing classes, rather than needing a whole new class or trying to awkwardly shoehorn it into the Mystic class.  Some of the abilities in this new UA are lackluster but it's a good starting point.  I also like the idea of adding a mental/telepathy focused Wizard subclass (different than the current Enchanter) -- as another option not as the only psion "class".  So in short, colour me excited for the current UA as an addition to the excitement I have for the Mystic.   I'd love to see them all developed.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />* Even when modeling something not explicitly mind-power-driven.  I used the Mystic framework as a base to create a Cryomancer/Elsa-like class and it really played well, very flavorful and with a diverse set of abilities that provided and allowed for many creative uses.</blockquote>

Verification