Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Paul Farquhar" data-source="post: 9572204" data-attributes="member: 6906155">Well, the flavour text in the UA seems to be a mini-preview of the lore from the upcoming DM facing-FR book (which is confirmed Cormyr will be a major focus). And it's been at least 100 years* (in world) since WotC last properly looked at Cormyr, so it would be surprising if things hadn't changed.So I suspect you will get your context for this:*Further research indicates that the latest recorded event for Cormyr was in 1486, but that was a semi-canonical novel from 2014 (which would make it 4e). The most recent dated WotC FR stuff seems to be 1494 (including the conclusion of BG3, which I expect to feature in the new book). 8 years is plenty of time for an organisation to decide to take international recruits. And they might decide to move the clock on further of course. I wouldn't be surprised to see the new book give dates in the fifteen hundreds.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Paul Farquhar, post: 9572204, member: 6906155"] Well, the flavour text in the UA seems to be a mini-preview of the lore from the upcoming DM facing-FR book (which is confirmed Cormyr will be a major focus). And it's been at least 100 years* (in world) since WotC last properly looked at Cormyr, so it would be surprising if things hadn't changed. So I suspect you will get your context for this: *Further research indicates that the latest recorded event for Cormyr was in 1486, but that was a semi-canonical novel from 2014 (which would make it 4e). The most recent dated WotC FR stuff seems to be 1494 (including the conclusion of BG3, which I expect to feature in the new book). 8 years is plenty of time for an organisation to decide to take international recruits. And they might decide to move the clock on further of course. I wouldn't be surprised to see the new book give dates in the fifteen hundreds. [/QUOTE]

Verification