Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 3517620" data-attributes="member: 35788">Oi!That's just silly, but I know exactly what you mean.  This is one of the reasons why I dropped [Evil] and [Good] tags from the game.  I also changed the alignment system so that Good/Evil aren't one of the axis.  Whetehr someone is acting good or evil should not be something that gets written on their sheet, it should be something that can be told by their actions.And yes, that does mean spells like Prot from Evil are much more subjective, because being evil is a judgment call by the DM. But, now we stray into houserule territory.EDIT: For the record ... I also think it is silly that good clerics cannot cast contagion which only impares a person ... but can cast - oh, I don't know - Flamestrike?  I mean, it would be rare for contagion to actually kill someone.  It is relatively easy to think of Flamestrike killing!But, then again, D&D doesn't consider killing an act of evil - or even a harmful act.  After all, inflicting someone with a disease on purpose is obviously evil, but driving a sword through their heart and ending their life is good old fashioned fun!  [And yes, I'm being snyde, so don't take me 100% serious!]</blockquote>