Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
No 4E Fan Content Allowed on the Intenet?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 4974412" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>Even with the disagreements I've had with WotC practices, especially their PR, which combined have led me to no longer patron WotC - I and I'm sure a lot of people who work at WotC would take serious issue that they aren't <em>"gamers, for gamers"</em>. And, any company that doesn't pursue profits in the most efficient manner possible has no reason being in business in the first place. Now, alienating your customers, any of your customers, IMO is poor business practice - but, I'd attribute that more to PR gaffs and poor implementation than trying to make a GSL to stifle creativity. Making an overly draconian GSL is not in their best interest nor would it be concucive to the most efficient pursuit of profits. The existence of 3pp products actually help increase WotC sales. Bad 3pp products do not. The GSL was meant to prevent those bad products through better control of their IP, not by clamping down on unofficial creativity.</p><p> </p><p>IMO, the logic in the quote just doesn't hold up. WotC could have made an even more draconic GSL than what's already out, they could have refused to amend it after the furor over the original version, or they could have simply not allowed any kind of license at all - completely shutting out 3pp's and fan sites. They did none of those things.</p><p> </p><p>Nothing that they've done seem to contradict their stated goal of creating a license to better protect their IP than the OGL did. I won't deny they've botched it's implementation and the PR concerning it - but implying that the current WotC is not a company of gamers, or that they are less concerned with making a <em>"gamers"</em> game than making profits is really uncalled for, and ... just mean.</p><p> </p><p>Also, WotC past tolerance, or apparent lack of current tolerance, has absolutely nothing to do with <em>"clamping down on unofficial creativity"</em>.</p><p> </p><p>I challenge anyone to find an instance of WotC clamping down on any site, person, or medium with the intention of <em>"clamping down on unofficial creativity"</em>. Clamping down on violation of their IP - absolutely. Clamping down on creativity - No.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 4974412, member: 59506"] Even with the disagreements I've had with WotC practices, especially their PR, which combined have led me to no longer patron WotC - I and I'm sure a lot of people who work at WotC would take serious issue that they aren't [I]"gamers, for gamers"[/I]. And, any company that doesn't pursue profits in the most efficient manner possible has no reason being in business in the first place. Now, alienating your customers, any of your customers, IMO is poor business practice - but, I'd attribute that more to PR gaffs and poor implementation than trying to make a GSL to stifle creativity. Making an overly draconian GSL is not in their best interest nor would it be concucive to the most efficient pursuit of profits. The existence of 3pp products actually help increase WotC sales. Bad 3pp products do not. The GSL was meant to prevent those bad products through better control of their IP, not by clamping down on unofficial creativity. IMO, the logic in the quote just doesn't hold up. WotC could have made an even more draconic GSL than what's already out, they could have refused to amend it after the furor over the original version, or they could have simply not allowed any kind of license at all - completely shutting out 3pp's and fan sites. They did none of those things. Nothing that they've done seem to contradict their stated goal of creating a license to better protect their IP than the OGL did. I won't deny they've botched it's implementation and the PR concerning it - but implying that the current WotC is not a company of gamers, or that they are less concerned with making a [I]"gamers"[/I] game than making profits is really uncalled for, and ... just mean. Also, WotC past tolerance, or apparent lack of current tolerance, has absolutely nothing to do with [I]"clamping down on unofficial creativity"[/I]. I challenge anyone to find an instance of WotC clamping down on any site, person, or medium with the intention of [I]"clamping down on unofficial creativity"[/I]. Clamping down on violation of their IP - absolutely. Clamping down on creativity - No. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
No 4E Fan Content Allowed on the Intenet?
Top