Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 9280920" data-attributes="member: 7023887">Of the races in the PHB, Dwarves and (especially) Halflings have the most boring, uninspired subraces. Why are Dwarves that live in Mountains and Dwarves that live in Hills genetically different enough to warrant subraces? Why can't that just be a cultural difference? What the hell are &quot;Lightfoot&quot; and &quot;Stout&quot; halflings and why do they exist? I am more than okay removing these subraces, as they were bland and didn't need to exist. I'm not opposed to the concept of subraces for these species (although halfling subraces would have to take some convincing for me to accept them. I'm more of the opinion that &quot;halfling&quot; should just be a human subtype). They'd just have to be more interesting and significantly different than &quot;Hill&quot; and &quot;Mountain&quot;. What about Dwarves that live in Volcanos/Plane of Magma? Or Arctic Dwarves that carve fortresses into great glaciers?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Levistus's_Leviathan, post: 9280920, member: 7023887"] Of the races in the PHB, Dwarves and (especially) Halflings have the most boring, uninspired subraces. Why are Dwarves that live in Mountains and Dwarves that live in Hills genetically different enough to warrant subraces? Why can't that just be a cultural difference? What the hell are "Lightfoot" and "Stout" halflings and why do they exist? I am more than okay removing these subraces, as they were bland and didn't need to exist. I'm not opposed to the concept of subraces for these species (although halfling subraces would have to take some convincing for me to accept them. I'm more of the opinion that "halfling" should just be a human subtype). They'd just have to be more interesting and significantly different than "Hill" and "Mountain". What about Dwarves that live in Volcanos/Plane of Magma? Or Arctic Dwarves that carve fortresses into great glaciers? [/QUOTE]

Verification