Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 9308548" data-attributes="member: 22779">Just as a thought, do we really need different subspecies of Dragonborn?&nbsp; I mean, we kinda do now?&nbsp; Sorta?&nbsp; It's like a single chart that details out breath weapons and that's it.&nbsp; I mean, you could simplify that even further - make breath weapons deal force damage - just like gem dragonborn do - and then let the player flavor it however they like.&nbsp; That way no player gets screwed over and all the dragonborn are balanced against each other.&nbsp; I mean, if you take a red Dragonborn (or any fire breathing one) then your breath weapon is going to get resisted/immuned far more often than someone with, say, cold breath.&nbsp; Fire and poison, I suppose, are very, very common resistances/immunities.&nbsp; So, why not just give everyone Force damage as a breath weapon, free up the space that that rather pointless chart takes up, and be done with it?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 9308548, member: 22779"] Just as a thought, do we really need different subspecies of Dragonborn? I mean, we kinda do now? Sorta? It's like a single chart that details out breath weapons and that's it. I mean, you could simplify that even further - make breath weapons deal force damage - just like gem dragonborn do - and then let the player flavor it however they like. That way no player gets screwed over and all the dragonborn are balanced against each other. I mean, if you take a red Dragonborn (or any fire breathing one) then your breath weapon is going to get resisted/immuned far more often than someone with, say, cold breath. Fire and poison, I suppose, are very, very common resistances/immunities. So, why not just give everyone Force damage as a breath weapon, free up the space that that rather pointless chart takes up, and be done with it? [/QUOTE]

Verification