NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5260910" data-attributes="member: 2067">Totally unsubstantiated rumor. Let's get that out of the way first. I don't necessarily believe it. It's vaguely plausible, but controversial, which makes it good rumor-mill fodder. That doesn't rule out it also being true, but it certainly leads me to skepticism.About the 4.5ing going on: It's a marketing game.[sblock]That's not what (most? any?) people are saying by claiming this is 4.5.Let's have a bit of an education.In the lead up to 3.5, the designers made the point, time and again, that this was the same game, and you didn't have to update anything, and these changes were basically optional, and that no one was throwing away your old ranger, but here's a new one, if you want, that we think is maybe better than the old one. 3.5 didn't delete old material. 3.5 didn't burn all the 3.0 books. 3.0 and 3.5 were totally cross-compatible, and that was announced loudly in the build up to 3.5.Ditto with 2e Skills & Powers.That does sound familiar to what is happening now.Skills and Powers fell into the trap of not actually being compatible. I really don't think that's gonig to happen now.What made "3.5" something of a problem was that the implied upgrade was there, and it made a swath of products a little difficult to use, because it felt like a break with what had come before. The books looked different, and the improvements were obvious, and it felt a little lame buying anything that came before the break.That may or may not happen now. Mearls has said on here that they still plan on printing pre-essentials style classes, and if that stays true, then the whole "this is a new game!" effect will be diminished significantly. By not calling it "4.5" or anything, they also rather strongly convey a message of "same game" (which the term "3.5" did not do). That's 90% marketing buzz, though. That's controlling consumer perceptions.The big test will be in the releases. But 4e's releases have been constantly changing (the difference between the first MM and MM3 is marked, at least as distinct at the transition between 3.0 and 3.5, but without any of the nerd rage that typified that transition), so it's harder to tell if there's a "hard break."In a way, there's been many soft breaks. Which might be successful in limiting the nerd rage. Maybe it's easier to accept Essentials having already accepted the PHB3, which was easier to accept after the PHB2, and so on. Saying "THIS ISN'T 4.5!!!!" is just as inane and meaningless on the surface as saying "THIS IS CLEARLY 4.5 UNDER A DIFFERENT NAME!!!!!" What "4.5" means is a pretty fluid, dynamic, and subjective thing. Ultimately, what it signifies is a "significant break." Even if the 3.5 transition was not that significant of a break, the impression is that it was. FWIW, it doesn't look like Essentials will be a significant break to me. Not publishing the first core books anymore would nudge it more in that direction, but I'm not even sure it would complete the transition. It's a possibility that WotC may plan to phase out all the core books like this, so that we're all running on a constant 4.x treadmill, keeping up with the most recent versions, using DDI to access past versions, etc. Not sure that would be smart, but it's an idea.But this line looks bigger than the PHB3, and bigger than 3.5 was, but not quite a "Skills & Powers" debacle.[/sblock]On the change itelf, if true?It seems like a silly thing for them to do, to stop supporting their current edition by letting a book lapse out of print like that. Where will the people Essentials hooks go to find a more complex fighter, or a martial healer, or a rogue with dailies, or whatever, if they want it? If this does happen, I bet we'll see a "revised" PHB, with erratta and such included, pretty soon.</blockquote>

Verification