Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Charwoman Gene" data-source="post: 5261729" data-attributes="member: 5044">Well, it depends.  If you've already made up your mind that WotC is a single entity that consistently makes the same words mean the same thing in statements issued 10 years apart under different teams, then sure, oh yeah, you really prooved your point, all the people who are wrong on the Internet are sure gonna stop being wrong now, thanks to your timely research.If you judge the validity of statements based on the trustworthiness of those making them, less so.Could you please show me the Errata documents from the late 3.0 era showing how they already nerfed buff spells, or fixed weapon size rules, or modded damage reduction?  All signs point that Essentials is a reprinting of the current rules, and a re-presentation of many early classes in a way that plays fine with the rules of the game, but have some concerns with how certain concepts will mesh.  Psionic classes had the same issues.  Yes, there is a concern there for some, but nothing says WotC is being deceptive, quite the opposite.  They've implied the rulebooks will go out of print, explicitly stated the rules aren't changing, except in ways they were going to errata anyway.</blockquote>