No pro-football thread here???

GlassJaw said:
This year's Superbowl will be help the weekend of the 19th - Colts at Patriots.

While the AFC Championship game is likely to feature better teams than the Super Bowl (and the Chargers and Jags will have at least a little to say about things), and the AFC Champion will be heavily favored in the Super Bowl, this does not mean the AFC Championship Game is, in fact, the Super Bowl.

Really, if they can get there, I think the worst matchup for the Pats is the Pack. I may be a shameless Packers fan, but a high-powered pass offense, good pass rush, and good corners are most of what you need to give New England a game, and Green Bay has that. Indy's got most of that (and their offense is better and better balanced), but their pass rush has been decimated by injuries to Freeney and Mathis.
 

log in or register to remove this ad



Me, a masochist. I wonder.

Another ____Dave agrees on the pats. From David Noonans Blog:

WotC_Dave said:
Why You Should Root Against the Patriots: As far as me and my buddies can tell, no American city has captured all three of the big pro sports championships (baseball, football, basketball) in one twelve-month year. But Boston has one in hand right now (baseball), a football team that’s a freakish juggernaught, and a basketball team that’s one of the best in the East. Mark my words: If Boston pulls off all three championships, their sports fans will achieve a level of smug insufferability that will make all the rest of us miserable. (And remember, I’ve got to sit near Bostonian Mearls, so this is a very real danger.)
And I genuinely like the Celtics—how can you not admire Garnett’s intensity and work ethic? So please, someone beat the Patriots so I’m not forced to root against the Celtics.

As a side note, someone with some sort of sports-database access could probably tell me whether it’s actually true that no city has captured all three championships in the same year. I could think of only one city that pulled off two-out-of-three: Boston in 2004 (Sox and Patriots). There may be others. And if you include hockey or college sports, then that muddies the waters further, but there might be some really neat “this was the perfect time to be a fan” moments in history out there.

And if you accept the premise that three championships in a 12-month period is the best thing that could happen to a city’s sports fans, then perhaps the most soul-crushing thing would be for a city’s three teams to all reach their respective championship games, then lose. I don’t think that’s ever happened either. I could think of only one city that did a two-out-of-three. Surprise, surprise—it’s Boston, whose Patriots lost the January 1986 Superbowl to the Bears, then whose Red Sox lost the World Series (the Bill Buckner grounder, remember?) the following October. But the Celtics were pretty darn good during that timespan.

This suggests that there may in fact be something special about Boston sports fans, who’ve experienced the greatest highs (2004 and maybe now) and the most crushing lows (1986) in the last 25 years. As someone with a genetic mandate to root for Chicago sports teams, I can’t tell you how much it pains me to admit this.
 


Gibs: its was a shock. And its probably means more overpriced restructuring for little gain. Oh well, the Daniel Snyder--the owner--claims he learned things from Gibbs. We'll see.
 


Remove ads

Top