Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No secrets can be kept due to Consult Oracle?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5011652" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>I think where I'm coming from is that a scenario is VERY likely to arise something like:</p><p></p><p>Player: I cast Consult Oracle and ask "<plot unraveling question here>."</p><p>DM: Uh.... (DM now has choice, unravel plot or limit what CO reveals by some means).</p><p></p><p>Yes, the classic response to this is the DM should have thought of this ahead of time. Right.... So every single plot the DM uses from now on has to be CO-proofed by having the bad guys go through some pretzel twists of secretly hiring assassins in a dark room or some other similar nonsense. Or making up some kind of anti-divination rituals/items/whatever. Or who knows what. Its at best a monumental pain in the DM's backside. Worse still the players will inevitably find flaws in all of these DM machinations. The DM will forget to consider some plot angles in some situations, etc. The cost of casting the ritual will for a while deter player fishing expeditions, but by Epic level 3600 gp will be pocket change and any reasonably clever party will be spamming this thing all over the place. </p><p></p><p>I'm perfectly fine with it working well most of the time and I agree that the DM should avoid nerfing things that the players are paying to use, but there ARE going to be times when the proper response is simply "you don't learn anything useful". Hopefully the DM will be able to couch that in terms of obscure or useless answers to questions, but there may be times when "the oracle doesn't know" is the option at hand. This simply WILL come up sometimes. I don't care if the ritual text said outright "the oracle always knows the answers to any question and always answers", it STILL isn't always going to produce good information in any given actual game if its used often enough. </p><p></p><p>There's no theoretical or rules based question about this, it simply IS the way it will be. So I can completely understand the "these kinds of rituals are worthless" sentiment, though I think its pretty heavily overblown. CO will be highly useful to the party, but they shouldn't expect it to be a Swiss army knife any more than any other ability they have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5011652, member: 82106"] I think where I'm coming from is that a scenario is VERY likely to arise something like: Player: I cast Consult Oracle and ask "<plot unraveling question here>." DM: Uh.... (DM now has choice, unravel plot or limit what CO reveals by some means). Yes, the classic response to this is the DM should have thought of this ahead of time. Right.... So every single plot the DM uses from now on has to be CO-proofed by having the bad guys go through some pretzel twists of secretly hiring assassins in a dark room or some other similar nonsense. Or making up some kind of anti-divination rituals/items/whatever. Or who knows what. Its at best a monumental pain in the DM's backside. Worse still the players will inevitably find flaws in all of these DM machinations. The DM will forget to consider some plot angles in some situations, etc. The cost of casting the ritual will for a while deter player fishing expeditions, but by Epic level 3600 gp will be pocket change and any reasonably clever party will be spamming this thing all over the place. I'm perfectly fine with it working well most of the time and I agree that the DM should avoid nerfing things that the players are paying to use, but there ARE going to be times when the proper response is simply "you don't learn anything useful". Hopefully the DM will be able to couch that in terms of obscure or useless answers to questions, but there may be times when "the oracle doesn't know" is the option at hand. This simply WILL come up sometimes. I don't care if the ritual text said outright "the oracle always knows the answers to any question and always answers", it STILL isn't always going to produce good information in any given actual game if its used often enough. There's no theoretical or rules based question about this, it simply IS the way it will be. So I can completely understand the "these kinds of rituals are worthless" sentiment, though I think its pretty heavily overblown. CO will be highly useful to the party, but they shouldn't expect it to be a Swiss army knife any more than any other ability they have. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No secrets can be kept due to Consult Oracle?
Top