A AuraSeer Prismatic Programmer Jan 15, 2003 #11 gfunk said: The Sage has ruled that Non-Detection forces a caster level check against See Invisibility and True Seeing. Click to expand... This isn't in the FAQ; do you have a cite? I seem to recall seeing exactly the opposite ruling, so one of us is misremembering.
gfunk said: The Sage has ruled that Non-Detection forces a caster level check against See Invisibility and True Seeing. Click to expand... This isn't in the FAQ; do you have a cite? I seem to recall seeing exactly the opposite ruling, so one of us is misremembering.
I Iku Rex Explorer Jan 15, 2003 #12 AuraSeer said: This isn't in the FAQ; do you have a cite? I seem to recall seeing exactly the opposite ruling, so one of us is misremembering. Click to expand... You're misremembering. (I'm pretty sure there is a posted e-mail (indirectly) answering this one somewhere on the rules board, but I don't have search.)
AuraSeer said: This isn't in the FAQ; do you have a cite? I seem to recall seeing exactly the opposite ruling, so one of us is misremembering. Click to expand... You're misremembering. (I'm pretty sure there is a posted e-mail (indirectly) answering this one somewhere on the rules board, but I don't have search.)
B bret First Post Jan 15, 2003 #13 Detect Magic is Universal. Using the line of reasoning that Non-detection only protects against Divinations results in it not working against Detect Magic.
Detect Magic is Universal. Using the line of reasoning that Non-detection only protects against Divinations results in it not working against Detect Magic.
K Kyramus First Post Jan 16, 2003 #14 see invis is divination, which prompts the person who has it trying to find a nondetected invisible creature to roll a caster level check.
see invis is divination, which prompts the person who has it trying to find a nondetected invisible creature to roll a caster level check.
