The_Gneech
Explorer
Psion said:That was my feeling before I switched to 3e.
Not to hijack the thread, but ain't it weird how that works? The core principles between the two editions are the same (kill monsters, take their treasure), most of the fluff parts are the same or very similar, and I'll readily admit that the actual gameplay between older editions and the current isn't that different. The ranger I played in 1997 and the ranger I play today could easily step back and forth from one campaign to the other without the characters noticing anything, even though the character sheets are radically different.
Nevertheless, the differences are enough that even going back to play, say, "Baldur's Gate" sets my teeth on edge because I find myself cursing the 2e rules ... and nowadays there are even 3.0 purists who hate 3.5, etc.
What is this power the system has, when theoretically it's the playing of the game that's important? I find it mind-boggling.
-The Gneech