Not enough selection of at-wills in 4e?

[Windjammer]

Well, both Arcane Power and Martial Power are out.

Do people feel that all martial and arcane classes have sufficient at-wills to choose from?

I think fighters, rogues, and wizards are fine.

I can't comment on wizards, but I found it odd that you mentioned fighters and rogues. Martial Power doubled the number of at-wills for fighter (to 8 in total) but only added a single at-will for rogues. So I guess we have to factor in:

1) the new range of utility powers, where rogues get at-wills (if they choose them), and

2) the fact that fighter builds are more specialised and don't lend themselves that easily to "lending an at-will from a class build that's not your own" as rogues do where the Martial Power builds - aerialist and cutthroat - are minor variations of the PHB1 builds - of trickster and brawny rogue respectively. Meaning, an aerialist can meaningfully select trickster at-wills and vice versa, and a brawny rogue could do with cut throat at-wills, and vice versa.

I've been toying mostly with 2). I think 4E is currently too much streamlining character builds into single builds. I'd like to play an avenger, for instance, who can sufficiently excel at pursuit and isolation (complementory tactical skills anyhow). Because if he can't, what's the point of selecting your at-wills from both build-pools?