RangerWickett
Legend
This review at RPGNow - http://www.rpgnow.com/product_reviews_info.php?mid=313&reviews_id=15838& - makes me curious. Do other people share the same opinion regarding the tension in the third adventure?
I hope that, in the grand scale of the campaign, the third adventure accomplishes the necessary task of broadening the scope of the conflict, and that the immediate danger from Ragesia returns in adventure four. I wanted to make Seaquen into a legitimate safe haven, so I can threaten it later. What do you think? Would you have wanted more immediate tension from Ragesia in the third adventure, and if so how would you have wanted to include it?
Review said:It doesn't link to the War of the Burning Sky plot in the sort of obvious ways one might expect. The sense of tension and threat from the forces of the Empire is further muted in this third installment, only truly manifesting later in the story.
I hope that, in the grand scale of the campaign, the third adventure accomplishes the necessary task of broadening the scope of the conflict, and that the immediate danger from Ragesia returns in adventure four. I wanted to make Seaquen into a legitimate safe haven, so I can threaten it later. What do you think? Would you have wanted more immediate tension from Ragesia in the third adventure, and if so how would you have wanted to include it?