Psion
Adventurer
I am running an OA campaign next week (see this thread for more information) and I am considering which shaman to use. But in truth, I am torn. As I stated earlier, for a run of the mill D&D game, I think sticking with the shaman's handbook is the way to go. But in an oriental setting with rampant spirits, Mongoose's shaman is really compelling.
So I am considering including both the OA shaman and the Mongoose shaman in my next OA campaign. But how do I differentiate between them in the game?
I am thinking of giving the OA shaman a more vedic and buddhist twist, where they seek to emulate an array of enlightened spirits. They draw power from the collective divinity of these spirits, and thus act much like a cleric.
The Mongoose shaman will be more like a traditional chinese Wu, a holy many that bargains with spirits and intecedes on behalf of the people. The wu's relationship with spirits is more personal, and they act much more like a divine sorcerer.
What do you think? Any other ideas or recommendations? What about names for these two shaman types to distinguish them?
So I am considering including both the OA shaman and the Mongoose shaman in my next OA campaign. But how do I differentiate between them in the game?
I am thinking of giving the OA shaman a more vedic and buddhist twist, where they seek to emulate an array of enlightened spirits. They draw power from the collective divinity of these spirits, and thus act much like a cleric.
The Mongoose shaman will be more like a traditional chinese Wu, a holy many that bargains with spirits and intecedes on behalf of the people. The wu's relationship with spirits is more personal, and they act much more like a divine sorcerer.
What do you think? Any other ideas or recommendations? What about names for these two shaman types to distinguish them?