Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 7506354" data-attributes="member: 15700">This survey is about how satisfied you feel with each of the classes.&nbsp; You rated them lower than you actually feel, based on the timeline of implementation, which had nothing to do with how satisfied you are with the actual class.&nbsp; That skews the satisfaction ratings lower falsely.Any time you answer a question not based on the question actually asked, but by a different interpretation on another unrelated factor, you're screwing up the results.&nbsp; So good job on that.*Edit:&nbsp; This is what doing what you did will do.&nbsp; Imagine if everyone did what you did.&nbsp; That they actually are satisfied with a hexblade, but they all rated it as dissatisfied because it wasn't part of the core book (not the question asked).&nbsp; If I, as the WoTC team see those ratings as all dissatisfied (again, not know the reasons given by everyone), I'm going to think it's a badly designed class and do a redesign, even though that's not what anyone wanted.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 7506354, member: 15700"] This survey is about how satisfied you feel with each of the classes. You rated them [I]lower [/I]than you actually feel, based on the timeline of implementation, which had nothing to do with how satisfied you are with the actual class. That skews the satisfaction ratings lower falsely. Any time you answer a question not based on the question actually asked, but by a different interpretation on another unrelated factor, you're screwing up the results. So good job on that. *Edit: This is what doing what you did will do. Imagine if everyone did what you did. That they actually are satisfied with a hexblade, but they all rated it as dissatisfied because it wasn't part of the core book (not the question asked). If I, as the WoTC team see those ratings as all dissatisfied (again, not know the reasons given by everyone), I'm going to think it's a badly designed class and do a redesign, [I]even though[/I] that's not what anyone wanted. [/QUOTE]

Verification