Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
OGL 1.2 survey is now live
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FormerLurker" data-source="post: 8910803" data-attributes="member: 7031660"><p>Cancelling accounts also creates a support ticket. (As does filing a complaint.) You're reading what you want to read.</p><p>Admittedly it is unclear in that article and it does include those details in the same paragraph making it seem like they were talking about deletions.</p><p>Especially as outright deleting accounts would be a stupid thing to do. You'd lose all your books you've paid for. And since you can't come back, there's no reason for WotC to make any changes. If you cancel, there's a way for them to get you to return...</p><p></p><p>However, the support team is also understaffed AND was just returning for the two week holiday break. So a not insignificant number of those tickets were likely unrelated.</p><p></p><p>People don't just go to court for no reason.</p><p>Lawyers are expensive. Someone like Paizo isn't going to just sue on a whim to get brownie points with the community. They're not going to blow most of their profits for the year on lawyers unless they think it's absolutely necessary. If they weren't going to be able to sell their books, then absolutely. It's sue or go out of business. But since they'll likely have a goodly amount of time to update their unpublished books to ORC <em><strong>and</strong></em> still be able to publish existing books, then they have no reason to sue. It's not losing them any revenue, so there's no benefit to the lawsuit: even if the win, they're still out millions. </p><p></p><p>WotC could destroy most 3PP for a variety of reasons without even trying. Kobold Press once released a book that heavily plagiarized the <em>Dungeon Master's Guide</em>. WotC could have destroyed them. But they didn't. Because the D&D team was friends with the head Kobold and knew it was an accident, and Kobold Press corrected the error. </p><p>This is just baseless fear mongering. </p><p></p><p>Quite the opposite. Feedback is not meaningless.</p><p>Okay, feedback that is just "QQ don't remove the OGL 1.0a QQ" is meaningless. But feedback on the OGL 1.2 and it's final form is very meaningful, and good feedback can have real impact. There's lots of ways it can be improved, but no one is discussing them because they're rather whine about the 1.0a going away. </p><p></p><p>WotC isn't stopping people from making Pathfinder 3PP. No one is "stifling" them.</p><p>The simple reason is that no one is making PF2 3PP because they can make ten times as much money with a mediocre selling 5e 3PP. </p><p></p><p>Dethroning the God-King of RPGs won't change how much money you can make for a Pathfinder 3PP. It will just mean that's <em>all </em>you can make, so you'll settle for the scraps instead of the feast. </p><p>It doesn't help 3PP. It actually seriously hurts them, especially if it drives players to the many, many game systems that aren't released under an open license and don't support 3PP. </p><p>Looking at the chart of top RPGs for the past few years (Dungeons & Dragons, Pathfinder, G.I. Joe, Power Rangers, Fallout, Call of Cthulhu, Cyberpunk, Alien, Fate, Starfinder, Shadowrun, Vampire, Star Wars, Legend of the Five Rings, Star Trek) only four of those have an open gaming license.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FormerLurker, post: 8910803, member: 7031660"] Cancelling accounts also creates a support ticket. (As does filing a complaint.) You're reading what you want to read. Admittedly it is unclear in that article and it does include those details in the same paragraph making it seem like they were talking about deletions. Especially as outright deleting accounts would be a stupid thing to do. You'd lose all your books you've paid for. And since you can't come back, there's no reason for WotC to make any changes. If you cancel, there's a way for them to get you to return... However, the support team is also understaffed AND was just returning for the two week holiday break. So a not insignificant number of those tickets were likely unrelated. People don't just go to court for no reason. Lawyers are expensive. Someone like Paizo isn't going to just sue on a whim to get brownie points with the community. They're not going to blow most of their profits for the year on lawyers unless they think it's absolutely necessary. If they weren't going to be able to sell their books, then absolutely. It's sue or go out of business. But since they'll likely have a goodly amount of time to update their unpublished books to ORC [I][B]and[/B][/I] still be able to publish existing books, then they have no reason to sue. It's not losing them any revenue, so there's no benefit to the lawsuit: even if the win, they're still out millions. WotC could destroy most 3PP for a variety of reasons without even trying. Kobold Press once released a book that heavily plagiarized the [I]Dungeon Master's Guide[/I]. WotC could have destroyed them. But they didn't. Because the D&D team was friends with the head Kobold and knew it was an accident, and Kobold Press corrected the error. This is just baseless fear mongering. Quite the opposite. Feedback is not meaningless. Okay, feedback that is just "QQ don't remove the OGL 1.0a QQ" is meaningless. But feedback on the OGL 1.2 and it's final form is very meaningful, and good feedback can have real impact. There's lots of ways it can be improved, but no one is discussing them because they're rather whine about the 1.0a going away. WotC isn't stopping people from making Pathfinder 3PP. No one is "stifling" them. The simple reason is that no one is making PF2 3PP because they can make ten times as much money with a mediocre selling 5e 3PP. Dethroning the God-King of RPGs won't change how much money you can make for a Pathfinder 3PP. It will just mean that's [I]all [/I]you can make, so you'll settle for the scraps instead of the feast. It doesn't help 3PP. It actually seriously hurts them, especially if it drives players to the many, many game systems that aren't released under an open license and don't support 3PP. Looking at the chart of top RPGs for the past few years (Dungeons & Dragons, Pathfinder, G.I. Joe, Power Rangers, Fallout, Call of Cthulhu, Cyberpunk, Alien, Fate, Starfinder, Shadowrun, Vampire, Star Wars, Legend of the Five Rings, Star Trek) only four of those have an open gaming license. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
OGL 1.2 survey is now live
Top