Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"OK, I try Skill A. Now Skill B. Well, in that case, how about Skill C?"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 9125046" data-attributes="member: 6801845"><p>Unless they are doing something truly different, I just don't allow it. If they ask for a skill (which is fine by me) they gave it their best shot, especially for knowledge checks. It's not like they were trying to remember what they know from history but ignoring what they might know from religion. If they state that they're looking at something and searching their memory I'll tell them something along the lines of "Give me a history or religion check". As far as I'm concerned knowledge type checks (history, religion, arcana, etc.) are basically the same things. </p><p></p><p>There are exceptions to every rule of course for example they might first just try to physically move something and then when it doesn't work try to see if they remember something. They might look around and get a perception check and then decide to examine something in particularly closely meaning an investigation check. There are also potentially multiple ways around an obstacle or different ways of solving a puzzle.</p><p></p><p>How they declare their actions really makes a difference to me and I can't remember a time when the "describe what they do" would make much of a difference anyway.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: I like [USER=7016699]@prabe[/USER]'s idea of advantage if they have proficiency in multiple knowledge skills, I may have to try that out. It also makes sense - it's not like I think about what I learned from source A and completely ignore source B, I'm just trying to remember what I know on a given topic. But interdisciplinary knowledge can add up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 9125046, member: 6801845"] Unless they are doing something truly different, I just don't allow it. If they ask for a skill (which is fine by me) they gave it their best shot, especially for knowledge checks. It's not like they were trying to remember what they know from history but ignoring what they might know from religion. If they state that they're looking at something and searching their memory I'll tell them something along the lines of "Give me a history or religion check". As far as I'm concerned knowledge type checks (history, religion, arcana, etc.) are basically the same things. There are exceptions to every rule of course for example they might first just try to physically move something and then when it doesn't work try to see if they remember something. They might look around and get a perception check and then decide to examine something in particularly closely meaning an investigation check. There are also potentially multiple ways around an obstacle or different ways of solving a puzzle. How they declare their actions really makes a difference to me and I can't remember a time when the "describe what they do" would make much of a difference anyway. EDIT: I like [USER=7016699]@prabe[/USER]'s idea of advantage if they have proficiency in multiple knowledge skills, I may have to try that out. It also makes sense - it's not like I think about what I learned from source A and completely ignore source B, I'm just trying to remember what I know on a given topic. But interdisciplinary knowledge can add up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"OK, I try Skill A. Now Skill B. Well, in that case, how about Skill C?"
Top