You, amongst others. You are doing it. You are implying that if people do not agree with you, not only are they wrong, but they are wrong in such a way that they are actively supporting racism.
I believe you also mentioned the 'dunning kruger' effect earlier, as well? Perhaps it was another.
But yes, there is a definite subtext here, one in which that... and let me be very clear...you are implying anyone who does not agree with your changes are aiding and abetting real, actual racism.
It is quite the clever trick. To bully others, to browbeat them and then scream 'Im being attacked!' when someone calls you out on it? Clever indeed.
But of course, since YOU don't see it happening and it's not affecting you in particular...must not be happening right?