Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
One D&D Expert Classes Playtest Document Is Live
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie the Duck" data-source="post: 8784511" data-attributes="member: 6799660"><p>I think that's the reason. So many people found the even one or two levels of exhaustion so debilitating* that they effectively retreated until restored once they hit that (making the rest of the scale superfluous). It's the situation of a damage-scale to dangerous with which to engage. Symabaroum and Wraith: the Oblivion have the same issue: permanent corruption was so onerous that players don't go near the point where they risk gaining any (making most of the scale leading up to it wasted).</p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">*In exploration/survival situations, even one level got you disadvantage on all the skills you would use to explore/survive, making people highly resistant to pressing on.</span></p><p></p><p>Hmm. My recollection is that that was kinda all over the map. Looking at 1E and BX, in BX most of the resolution information is in the Player section, but 1E puts most of the rules of play in the DMG.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>He said that '[they] don't want their design to chase phantoms.' Unless you think the game design chases individual people, your interpretation of his comments literally do not make sense. The second half of the sentence clarifies what phantoms are in contrast to ('real desires held by a large number of players.'). He seems to be, in effect, saying 'we're looking into the possibility of alternate classes, but we are still in process of making sure that it would address the desires held by a significant number of people'), which is a perfectly reasonable position to have. The way he said it is a little tin-eared and clumsy, but it is unsurprising both that a gamer might be a little socially inadept or that someone shooting out a quick tweet on Twitter might accidentally step on toes (seems to be the reigning stereotypes of each thing).</p><p></p><p>More broadly, none of that has anything to do with whether the creators have big egos or not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie the Duck, post: 8784511, member: 6799660"] I think that's the reason. So many people found the even one or two levels of exhaustion so debilitating* that they effectively retreated until restored once they hit that (making the rest of the scale superfluous). It's the situation of a damage-scale to dangerous with which to engage. Symabaroum and Wraith: the Oblivion have the same issue: permanent corruption was so onerous that players don't go near the point where they risk gaining any (making most of the scale leading up to it wasted). [SIZE=1]*In exploration/survival situations, even one level got you disadvantage on all the skills you would use to explore/survive, making people highly resistant to pressing on.[/SIZE] Hmm. My recollection is that that was kinda all over the map. Looking at 1E and BX, in BX most of the resolution information is in the Player section, but 1E puts most of the rules of play in the DMG. He said that '[they] don't want their design to chase phantoms.' Unless you think the game design chases individual people, your interpretation of his comments literally do not make sense. The second half of the sentence clarifies what phantoms are in contrast to ('real desires held by a large number of players.'). He seems to be, in effect, saying 'we're looking into the possibility of alternate classes, but we are still in process of making sure that it would address the desires held by a significant number of people'), which is a perfectly reasonable position to have. The way he said it is a little tin-eared and clumsy, but it is unsurprising both that a gamer might be a little socially inadept or that someone shooting out a quick tweet on Twitter might accidentally step on toes (seems to be the reigning stereotypes of each thing). More broadly, none of that has anything to do with whether the creators have big egos or not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
One D&D Expert Classes Playtest Document Is Live
Top