candidus_cogitens said:
Fixating? Why is it necessary to make insulting remarks like that. I just find it interesting. Apparently you do to, or you wouldnt be replying. Your apology is accepted in advance.
Apology? I hope you're prepared to wait a while. I've said nothing that merits an apology.
If I told you off for your condescension, then I might see fit to apologize. Probably not, but I might.
Now, as to the distinction between decipher and read ... I understand that perfectly well. The fact remains that you cannot read faster than 250 words/min.
I never said I could. I was merely pointing out that reciting something out loud, especially when you're already familiar with the text, is far faster than translating meaning from an unfamiliar language.
Activating a scroll is innately different from translating magical writing. I was pointing out one possible explanation.
Frankly, I doubt you can do much better than that in English, much less in a difficult and less familiar system of notation. That's reading!!
Well now. It's entirely irrelevant, but since you asked, I decided to time myself, using the first post of this thread. In one six-second round I got as far as the word "minimum"-- 42 words, if I've counted correctly. That's 420 words per minute. Not even close to the world record of 637, but faster than I would have expected.
But back to the topic.
You still haven't explained why a scroll must necessarily contain more than a page of text. I haven't seen that specified anywhere in the rules, but perhaps I missed it. If you have a rules cite, please refer to the appropriate page in the books or the SRD.
In the absence of a specific rule, nothing says that scrolls must be long. Maybe an average scroll consists of 25 words or less, which would make reading it a one-round task, even at 250 wpm.