Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
(OOC) DND 3.5 The Flames of War
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neurotic" data-source="post: 9374272" data-attributes="member: 24380"><p>The approaches I've seen before:</p><p>1. Everyone posts as they can, DM orders the actions by initiative and adjudicates the actions by intent if there was something impossible (i.e. one character kills the enemy earlier in the initiative, but later in posts)</p><p>2. Actions happen in the order posted (more often than not, the DM also provides attack, damage (for OAs), remaining HP and AC of the monsters), players can narrate hits, misses and kills</p><p>3. Rarest: strict initiative, posts in order however long it takes. </p><p></p><p>Variations: some group monsters and players in several groups, others (most) simply lump monsters in one group players in the other and the initiative is really only relevant in the first round (flat-footed before you act etc)</p><p>Some post saves of the monsters too (rare)</p><p></p><p>Reactions are handled by announcing in advance your intent - otherwise what happens is that DM finishes the round, player X 3 days later says, I'm not hit I did <ability to avoid hits>, a week lost to retcon. If you didn't post probably or possible reaction, you didn't get it. Also, sometimes, DM uses your reaction if it seems something likely to be used without consulting you (killing blows, high crits, low HP, whatever) </p><p></p><p>In living 4e Mal Malenkirk posted his rules of initiative at the start of every adventure and most games adopted it (public monster info (relevant, not every power), initiative only at the start, map updates (we used google sheets so everyone could move their character and monsters affected by powers on their turn)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neurotic, post: 9374272, member: 24380"] The approaches I've seen before: 1. Everyone posts as they can, DM orders the actions by initiative and adjudicates the actions by intent if there was something impossible (i.e. one character kills the enemy earlier in the initiative, but later in posts) 2. Actions happen in the order posted (more often than not, the DM also provides attack, damage (for OAs), remaining HP and AC of the monsters), players can narrate hits, misses and kills 3. Rarest: strict initiative, posts in order however long it takes. Variations: some group monsters and players in several groups, others (most) simply lump monsters in one group players in the other and the initiative is really only relevant in the first round (flat-footed before you act etc) Some post saves of the monsters too (rare) Reactions are handled by announcing in advance your intent - otherwise what happens is that DM finishes the round, player X 3 days later says, I'm not hit I did <ability to avoid hits>, a week lost to retcon. If you didn't post probably or possible reaction, you didn't get it. Also, sometimes, DM uses your reaction if it seems something likely to be used without consulting you (killing blows, high crits, low HP, whatever) In living 4e Mal Malenkirk posted his rules of initiative at the start of every adventure and most games adopted it (public monster info (relevant, not every power), initiative only at the start, map updates (we used google sheets so everyone could move their character and monsters affected by powers on their turn) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
(OOC) DND 3.5 The Flames of War
Top