Interesting--I thought that Roy's crown-necklace was the phylactery, although I'm not sure why I thought that.Tiberius said:Security. They may have opted to leave Redcloak's somewhere where it would be safe for 1d10 days, as it is also Xykon's phylactery.
Pielorinho said:Interesting--I thought that Roy's crown-necklace was the phylactery, although I'm not sure why I thought that.
Daniel
Jakar said:Will the real Slim-Xykon please stand up.
Jdvn1 said:They're all decoys. Even Redcloak. Compare to OotS 300. Why would Redcloak have a different pendant?
Jdvn1 said:http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0416.html
Okay, Redcloak has had a different pendant. The Zykons have to all be decoys.
Tiberius said:Security. They may have opted to leave Redcloak's somewhere where it would be safe for 1d10 days, as it is also Xykon's phylactery.
Musrum said:demon roaches?
Pbartender said:The "Interesting... Greenhilt is here with his order of the stick..." "Who?" exchange would tend to favor Redcloak not being Xykon, and the Xykon with Redcloak not being Redcloak, since Xykon can never seem to remember Roy's name.
Endur said:I agree with that. Also the part about Redcloak saying this one is for Mom also favors Redcloak being Redcloak.