OotS #544

[Olgar Shiverstone]

Snarled

 

[dmccoy1693]

Glad it came. I was jonesing.

 

[diaglo]

i guess the pally is a boxers guy. cuz those don't look like briefs to me.

 

[shilsen]

"My "ken" is living in a Malibu dream house"

 

[Vurt]

I wonder if the Snarl will be Rich's way of 4e'ing the OOTS?

 

[dmccoy1693]

I wonder if the Snarl will be Rich's way of 4e'ing the OOTS?

Considering that the Snarl is older then the 4E announcement, I doubt if that was his original intent.

 

[Darkwolf71]

I wonder if the Snarl will be Rich's way of 4e'ing the OOTS?

That would be interesting, but didn't he say he wasn't going 4e?

 

[SPoD]

That would be interesting, but didn't he say he wasn't going 4e?

He hasn't said a single word on the subject, for or against. For some reason, though, a lot of people seem to think he has said that he isn't doing 4e. (Probably because there are some folks on his official forums that like to make declarative statements about what WILL happen, in absence of any evidence.)

It would make sense for him to not transfer, at least not until WOTC puts out a bard class, but that's not definitive.

 

[freyar]

The rifts are really deteriorating much more quickly now, aren't they?

Think this dilemma will get O'Chul to crack?

 

[Lord Zardoz]

I think I know what is going on here, based on a comment in Start of Darkness.

[SBLOCK]I think that the danger the Snarl poses is that something that is destroyed by the Snarl is destroyed utterly. If O'Chul is killed by the Snarl, he does not go on to the afterlife. He just ceases to exist. By leaving O'Chul near it as it expands, he expects the prisoner to give in. Hence the 'Safety of the Grave' comment; Being dead but in the afterlife is preferable to ceasing to exist.[/SBLOCK]

END COMMUNICATION