Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DragonBelow" data-source="post: 3494617" data-attributes="member: 40407">Granted, the larger the targets the harder it is to fit more in a AoE spell. But you realize that if you manage to fit just 2, you'll be beating the orbs 7 out 10 times, mostly at the lowest level of your table. That's what AoE spells are for anyway, hitting multiple targets, if you are using them for single targets, it's because that's the most dmg you can deal or maybe because it's the only thing you have left.The other thing you need to consider is how many single target / multiple targets encounters you face per gaming session, some times you'll face a single target, sometimes you'll face multiple targets. Why try to fit a square peg in a round hole? you should try to use the right spell for the right situation. What if you are fighting a bunch of mooks, taking them to -30 one at a time is not as effective as dropping them all at once to zero , not to mention the number of spells you need to do that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DragonBelow, post: 3494617, member: 40407"] Granted, the larger the targets the harder it is to fit more in a AoE spell. But you realize that if you manage to fit just 2, you'll be beating the orbs 7 out 10 times, mostly at the lowest level of your table. That's what AoE spells are for anyway, hitting multiple targets, if you are using them for single targets, it's because that's the most dmg you can deal or maybe because it's the only thing you have left. The other thing you need to consider is how many single target / multiple targets encounters you face per gaming session, some times you'll face a single target, sometimes you'll face multiple targets. Why try to fit a square peg in a round hole? you should try to use the right spell for the right situation. What if you are fighting a bunch of mooks, taking them to -30 one at a time is not as effective as dropping them all at once to zero , not to mention the number of spells you need to do that. [/QUOTE]

Verification