Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[OT] Sci-Fi Tax ?!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ColonelHardisson" data-source="post: 172863" data-attributes="member: 363"><p>I'm not sure how you're disagreeing with me. If you had read my posts carefully, you'd see that my whole point was that NASA <em>can't</em> fly missions based on scientific merit. It has to answer to Congress more stringently than many agencies, including, and perhaps especially, the military. It has to act more like a government agency than a scientific braintrust because it is somehow perceived as less necessary. The gist of what I'm saying is that NASA should be funded, and should be a government agency, because its mission as an agency will ultimately bear directly upon national security, even more than it does now. Just as we wouldn't turn the military over to mercenaries, we shouldn't turn NASA over to the private sector.</p><p></p><p>The military is a good counterargument to your assertion about privatizing NASA. The US military has to answer to Congress, and is tax funded. Yet it's the most powerful military on Earth. The point is that a government agency, properly funded, and given the ability to choose what it needs to fulfill its mission statement, can excel at what it does.</p><p></p><p>Regarding whether the recent disasters NASA has had with its missions recently, particularly the Mars missions, had anything to do with funding - of course they did. I won't defend the stupidity of the metric/English conversion. But, an agency that is underfunded, understaffed, flies more missions than it can handle in order to maintain its funding, is subjected to misinformed public scrutiny, and is becoming increasingly marginalized by public myopia, cannot be expected to excel. Privatizing the space program will most likely result in even less esploration of space and fewer scientific missions - humanity's forays into space will be relegated to putting up communications satellites, and not much else. It's getting that way now, and it hasn't been privatized. What would prompt the private sector to go into space in a big way?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ColonelHardisson, post: 172863, member: 363"] I'm not sure how you're disagreeing with me. If you had read my posts carefully, you'd see that my whole point was that NASA [i]can't[/i] fly missions based on scientific merit. It has to answer to Congress more stringently than many agencies, including, and perhaps especially, the military. It has to act more like a government agency than a scientific braintrust because it is somehow perceived as less necessary. The gist of what I'm saying is that NASA should be funded, and should be a government agency, because its mission as an agency will ultimately bear directly upon national security, even more than it does now. Just as we wouldn't turn the military over to mercenaries, we shouldn't turn NASA over to the private sector. The military is a good counterargument to your assertion about privatizing NASA. The US military has to answer to Congress, and is tax funded. Yet it's the most powerful military on Earth. The point is that a government agency, properly funded, and given the ability to choose what it needs to fulfill its mission statement, can excel at what it does. Regarding whether the recent disasters NASA has had with its missions recently, particularly the Mars missions, had anything to do with funding - of course they did. I won't defend the stupidity of the metric/English conversion. But, an agency that is underfunded, understaffed, flies more missions than it can handle in order to maintain its funding, is subjected to misinformed public scrutiny, and is becoming increasingly marginalized by public myopia, cannot be expected to excel. Privatizing the space program will most likely result in even less esploration of space and fewer scientific missions - humanity's forays into space will be relegated to putting up communications satellites, and not much else. It's getting that way now, and it hasn't been privatized. What would prompt the private sector to go into space in a big way? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[OT] Sci-Fi Tax ?!
Top