Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Wolfspider" data-source="post: 190399" data-attributes="member: 300">Interesting review of Episode II by Ebert <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert1/cst-ftr-ebert10.html" target="_blank">here</a>.Interesting commentary by Ebert on the effects of movie's digital filming <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/eb-feature/cst-ftr-ebert14.html" target="_blank">here</a>.I'm starting to swing in the direction of NOT going to see the film.&nbsp; Although I'm sure it will be action packed, from all reports it is rather soulless and poorly acted.&nbsp; The acting in Episode I is really what drove me up the wall, so I'm sure this will be a sticking point for me concerning Episode II.&nbsp; If, as Ebert suggests, the movie actually has a muddy appearance due to its digital filming and then transferral to regular flim, then that's even more reason for me to avoid it.&nbsp; My eyes are bad enough as it is.In any case, on the 16th I will be starting a thread (unless someone else beats me to it) asking all of my ENWorld buddies for their opinions of the film.&nbsp; I'll take all of your comments and the comments of other reviewers into consideration before I make my decision. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Wolfspider, post: 190399, member: 300"] Interesting review of Episode II by Ebert [url=http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert1/cst-ftr-ebert10.html]here[/url]. Interesting commentary by Ebert on the effects of movie's digital filming [url=http://www.suntimes.com/output/eb-feature/cst-ftr-ebert14.html]here[/url]. I'm starting to swing in the direction of NOT going to see the film. Although I'm sure it will be action packed, from all reports it is rather soulless and poorly acted. The acting in Episode I is really what drove me up the wall, so I'm sure this will be a sticking point for me concerning Episode II. If, as Ebert suggests, the movie actually has a muddy appearance due to its digital filming and then transferral to regular flim, then that's even more reason for me to avoid it. My eyes are bad enough as it is. In any case, on the 16th I will be starting a thread (unless someone else beats me to it) asking all of my ENWorld buddies for their opinions of the film. I'll take all of your comments and the comments of other reviewers into consideration before I make my decision. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification