Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo no longer publishing Dungeon and Dragon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nyeshet" data-source="post: 3465445" data-attributes="member: 18363"><p>Didn't WotC recently start a pay-for section on their website, or something like that? I seem to recall them having a poll some time ago regarding whether anyone would pay a regular fee for access to a section of the website having more content, etc. Perhaps this is the reason they've chosen to end Dungeon and Dragon. </p><p></p><p>And it is definitely WotC that is choosing to end it. As with 3rd party Ravenloft, they chose not to grant the option of a renewal, and thus the company involved had to end its publication (in the former case Ravenloft, in this case a couple magazines that have become classic sources of information for D&D). </p><p></p><p>Last time WotC forced the cancellation of an entire setting so that they could, some months later, release a Ravenloft Expedition book of their own that didn't need to be compatible with the published 3e version of the setting. </p><p></p><p>This time it seems that perhaps they feel their online option will have more people buying into it if it does not have the competition of two popular magazines: Dungeon and Dragon. </p><p></p><p>I'm guessing that the creation of Pathfinder is Paizo's way of coping with this loss, keeping up a magazine business despite the sudden and likely surprising (at the time they were informed of it) loss of the two magazines they have been publishing for years. </p><p></p><p></p><p>As another before has stated, I cannot really see WotC's online attempt ever being half as interesting, as useful, as well written, etc as either Dungeon or Dragon are / were. I expect it will, if not fail, at least not receive the sudden increase in subscriptions that WotC is obviously hoping will occur with the end of Dungeon and Dragon. The saddest thing is that even if their online attempt petters out, I doubt they would then allow Paizo to again print Dungeon and Dragon. They are destroying a couple classics on a gamble, a hope that they can gather a few new subscribers of their own by removing the competition. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I honestly hope Pathfinder does as well as its parents, Dungeon and Dragon. It deserves to do so well - if only as a fitting legacy of its predecessors.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nyeshet, post: 3465445, member: 18363"] Didn't WotC recently start a pay-for section on their website, or something like that? I seem to recall them having a poll some time ago regarding whether anyone would pay a regular fee for access to a section of the website having more content, etc. Perhaps this is the reason they've chosen to end Dungeon and Dragon. And it is definitely WotC that is choosing to end it. As with 3rd party Ravenloft, they chose not to grant the option of a renewal, and thus the company involved had to end its publication (in the former case Ravenloft, in this case a couple magazines that have become classic sources of information for D&D). Last time WotC forced the cancellation of an entire setting so that they could, some months later, release a Ravenloft Expedition book of their own that didn't need to be compatible with the published 3e version of the setting. This time it seems that perhaps they feel their online option will have more people buying into it if it does not have the competition of two popular magazines: Dungeon and Dragon. I'm guessing that the creation of Pathfinder is Paizo's way of coping with this loss, keeping up a magazine business despite the sudden and likely surprising (at the time they were informed of it) loss of the two magazines they have been publishing for years. As another before has stated, I cannot really see WotC's online attempt ever being half as interesting, as useful, as well written, etc as either Dungeon or Dragon are / were. I expect it will, if not fail, at least not receive the sudden increase in subscriptions that WotC is obviously hoping will occur with the end of Dungeon and Dragon. The saddest thing is that even if their online attempt petters out, I doubt they would then allow Paizo to again print Dungeon and Dragon. They are destroying a couple classics on a gamble, a hope that they can gather a few new subscribers of their own by removing the competition. I honestly hope Pathfinder does as well as its parents, Dungeon and Dragon. It deserves to do so well - if only as a fitting legacy of its predecessors. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo no longer publishing Dungeon and Dragon
Top