Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="morbiczer" data-source="post: 3466495" data-attributes="member: 15119">I guess this is true, but has not much to do with the issue at hand. For all we know, there were no problems with the profibility of Dungeon and Dragon for Paizo. There is nothing that would suggest that Paizo wouldn't have continued on producing both magazines if they have had the chance. I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories, but it appears that actually the opposite was true. It seems that a) Dungeon hurt the sales of WotC adventures and b) WotC feared the competition of the two magazines when they launch their online thing. So it could be argued that this decision by WotC was not because the magazines or the print magazine market in general had problems, but quite to the contrary, because the magazines were too good. Something else:Enworld is obviously only a small section of the D&D market + we aren't representative for the fanbase / buyers at whole. The avarage age here is certainly higher than the age of the avarage D&D custiomer. But I'm sure that it is not really a good sign if an announcement about a new INTERNET deal draws such a bad response from an INTERNET crowd.</blockquote>